Compactness in Metrizable Spaces: Proving X is Compact with Bounded Metrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter tylerc1991
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
tylerc1991
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (X,T) be a metrizable space such that every metric that generates T is bounded. Prove that X is compact.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking about this problem a bit before I headed off to work and wanted to get you guys' thoughts and/or ideas. At first I was trying to use the original definition of compactness, i.e. letting O be some open cover of X and assuming that there is no finite subcover of X and arriving at a contradiction. I didn't get anywhere with this so then I thought about trying to show sequential compactness but I don't see how a sequence necessarily converges in X. Any ideas? Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if this approach will work, but you should try it out. Assume it is not compact, so you can find a sequence (x_n)_n without convergent subsequence. Then X\setminus \{x_n~\vert~n&gt;0\} is an open set which is metrizable by a bounded metric (say d(x,y)<1). Now, we adjoin x_1 to this set and we set the distance d'(x_1,y)=2. Then we adjoin x_2 and we set the distance d'(x_2,y)=3, and so on.

I have a feeling this should work, but there are some details which you still need to check...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top