Compactness of a set of feasible solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter gjones89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the compactness of a set of feasible solutions in an Operations Research context. The original poster is working with a set of real numbers that must satisfy specific constraints related to an optimization problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish that the set of feasible solutions is compact, seeking guidance on relevant theorems or proof outlines. Some participants suggest that if the solution set consists of a finite number of points, it is compact, while others clarify that the set in question is infinite and uncountable, raising questions about the nature of compactness in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested that the properties of closed and bounded sets may apply, while others are questioning the implications of the constraints on the compactness of the solution set.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of advanced knowledge in Analysis, which may influence their understanding of the concepts being discussed. There is also a mention of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, suggesting that participants are considering established mathematical principles in their reasoning.

gjones89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am working on a problem in Operations Research but I need to prove a property related to compactness of a set. Although I expect it is quite elementary, I have never studied Analysis at an advanced level so am not sure how to do it.

I have an optimisation problem in which a feasible solution may be expressed as a set of real numbers [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] which satisfies the following constraints:

[itex]\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\leq \lambda[/itex] (here [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a positive real number),

[itex]\lambda_i\geq 0[/itex] for all [itex]i\in\{1,2,...,N\}[/itex].

The problem is I need to prove that the set of feasible solutions satisfying the above constraints is a compact set (closed and bounded), because this will enable me to prove that an optimal solution exists to the optimisation problem I am working on. I am sure this is probably quite standard and perhaps someone might be able to point me towards a theorem somewhere which will give me what I need, or just provide an outline of the proof if it is simple.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the solution set [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] consists of a finite set of points, then it is certainly compact. The closed interval ##[0,\lambda]## that contains all possible solutions is also a compact space.
 
Hi,

Sorry, I think I may not have explained it well enough. By 'set of feasible solutions' I mean the set of all sets [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] satisfying the constraints [itex]\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\leq \lambda[/itex] and [itex]\lambda_i\geq 0[/itex] for all [itex]i\in\{1,2,...,N\}[/itex]. This set will obviously be infinite (and uncountable), as there are infinitely many possible combinations [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] that satisfy these constraints.

To put it another way, I am trying to prove compactness of the following set:

[itex]\left\{(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n:\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\leq \lambda\text{ and }\lambda_i\geq 0\text{ for all }i\right\}.[/itex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a positive real number.

Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited:
gjones89 said:
Hi,

Sorry, I think I may not have explained it well enough. By 'set of feasible solutions' I mean the set of all sets [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] satisfying the constraints [itex]\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\leq \lambda[/itex] and [itex]\lambda_i\geq 0[/itex] for all [itex]i\in\{1,2,...,N\}[/itex]. This set will obviously be infinite (and uncountable), as there are infinitely many possible combinations [itex]\{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n\}[/itex] that satisfy these constraints.

To put it another way, I am trying to prove compactness of the following set:

[itex]\left\{(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,...,\lambda_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n:\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \lambda_i\leq \lambda\text{ and }\lambda_i\geq 0\text{ for all }i\right\}.[/itex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a positive real number.

Thanks for your help!

It's just Bolzano-Weierstrass, isn't it? Closed and bounded.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K