belvol16 said:
I guess I don't understand why the comparison test is applicable if you could obtain two different results.
You aren't getting two different results.
belvol16 said:
In one case it is 1/n!<1/n and that is divergent, but in another it is 1/n!<1/n^2 is convergent. I understand both of these inequalities are true and that 1/n! < 1/n^p is convergent for all p>1...but how is one able to just look past 1/n ?
Suppose that ##\sum c_n## is a known convergent series, and that ##\sum d_n## is a known divergent series. (c and d are chosen to be suggestive of convergence and divergence.)
Suppose also that you need to investigate the convergence or divergence of ##\sum a_n##.
There are four possible comparisons you could do with the two series whose behavior is known.
1) ##a_n > c_n##
2) ##a_n < c_n##
3) ##a_n > d_n##
4) ##a_n < d_n##
Only two of the four inequalities are helpful: (2) and (3).
For (1), determining that ##a_n## is larger than the corresponding term of a convergent series does us no good at all. Likewise, determining that ##a_n## is smaller than the corresponding term of a divergent series doesn't necessarily imply that ##\sum a_n## converges.
The upshot of all of this is that when you use the Comparison Test, you need to have an idea about whether the series you're working with converges or diverges. If you think your series
converges, you need to show that the terms of this series are
smaller than those of some
convergent series. If you think your series
diverges, you need to show that the terms of this series are
larger than those of some
divergent series.