Courses Compare Professors Teaching Course: Years of Experience vs. First Timers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of experienced professors compared to newer instructors in teaching courses. It highlights that while years of experience can contribute to teaching quality, this is not always the case. Many seasoned professors may fall into routines, reusing old materials without adapting or improving, which can diminish their teaching effectiveness. Conversely, newer professors often bring enthusiasm and innovation, especially if they have developed the course material themselves, leading to potentially better teaching outcomes. The conversation also notes that the passion for the subject plays a crucial role in teaching effectiveness across all experience levels. Additionally, changes in university hiring practices have led to younger professors often having more formal training in teaching, which may enhance their effectiveness. Ultimately, the quality of teaching varies significantly based on individual passion and engagement rather than solely on experience.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Do you think that they are better at teaching the course or worse at teaching the course, as compared to newer professors who might have taught the course for only a couple of times?

Obviously, I realize that there is no clear-cut relationship. *But*, there are certainly patterns to look for. Exceptional professors with years of experience are often exceptional for reasons *different* to exceptional professors who haven't taught the course before. Do the years of experience actually add up though? Many professors simply re-use the same problem sets from year to year, and don't seem to learn from their years of experience. Others lose their enthusiasm for teaching. And others don't even bother to use the latest technology since they have no incentive to improve.

Another pattern to look for is this: if the professor developed the course himself or if he is simply relying on the course structure that another professor developed. It seems that professors who rely on someone else's course structure tend to be worse teachers (it takes enthusiasm to actually develop your own course structure). Perhaps this is the precise reason why I've often felt that a disproportionate number of "amazing" professors are the ones who teach the course for the first time, since they're the ones who developed the course material (of course, they're often more disorganized, but Internet technology makes it much easier to correct disorganized material). Has anyone else noticed this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Simfish said:
Obviously, I realize that there is no clear-cut relationship.

Got it in one. Sometimes the guy with lots of practice does a really great job, and sometimes he goes through the motions.
 


It all depends on the individual, and I think the relative level of passion for the subject. Some first-time instructors are passionate about doing a good job and pour their heart and soul into a course. Others are stuck teaching something they don't care much about, but have accepted it as a duty for other reasons. And the same is true for people who've been doing it for a while.

The advantage you (occasionally) have as a student with veteran teachers is that you can talk to or look up assessements of their teaching styles and know what you're likely to be in for. First-timers are more of a "roll of the dice."

Another factor that may come into play may be changes in university hiring policies. Lately, the trend has been to look for people with proven teaching skills in addition to research skills, so the younger professors that you encounter as a student may have had more formal training or experience in teaching than their older counterparts.
 


i find there are 3 kinds of profs out there, ones with:

1)lots of experience with a love for their jobs - best prof you will ever have
2)little experience but willing to give it their all to prove themselves - good prof you can learn a lot from
3)lots of experience and simply going through the emotions - poor prof
 


I think it really depends on *why* a given professor has years of experience teaching a course. Has he/she simply been at the university long enough for the rotation to have fallen to him/her many times, or has he/she repeatedly volunteered for the course?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top