I agree with the above. The calc-based physics I had in college was much different from the calc-based physics that was taught at the community college where I served on the faculty which was much different from the calc-based physics at the Air Force Academy. I am mentoring two physics majors at a big state school in the south whose calc-based sequence is close to the one I had in college in the 1980s. But there is another calc-based sequence at the same university that is much different.
Over the past decade or two AP Physics C has been evolving in most implementations to be much closer to teaching to the test than I've ever seen in ANY college calc-based sequence. College sequences tend to conform to the teachers' view of "what these students need to really know." For example, at the Air Force Academy, they are training Air Force officers and there is a specific list of downstream engineering courses all or most of the students will take later at the Air Force Academy. At many places, the sequence taken by most Physics majors is designed for Physics majors, where the sequence taken by engineering majors (at engineering schools) has lots of features specific to that.
Also very common at some schools, is the dumbing down of the course to make sure 80-90% pass the course on the first try whether or not they do any homework. These are the versions that are much easier than a decent AP Physics C course where passing course grades are highly correlated with 3s, 4s, and 5s on the AP test.