Comparing Best-fits of different data sets that have different noise levels

zachzach
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have 2 sets of data: day1 and day2. I want to fit a model to both data sets and then compare them to each other to see which one fits the model the best (the fit is done with a computer using non-linear least squares method). The RMS of the fit would be fine except that day1 has much noisier data than day2 and the noise level is unknown. This makes the RMS of the fit for day1 (the noisy data) intrinsically larger than the RMS for day2 simply because of the noise. Is there anyway to compare the fits that is independent of the noise level?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how you can make a comparision unless you are willing to create a probability model for the data that includes the distribution of the noise. If you are willing to characterize the noise then you could consider a computation based on the "liklihood ratio test".
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top