Comparing different parpameters to be a plasmonic material

  • Thread starter Thread starter Debnath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
Debnath
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Everybody

I want to do the comparison of metals like Silver, Gold, Aluminum, Copper, Sodium and Potassium as plasmonic metals. Now, I am confused about some parameters about what they really mean.

1. what does ε(int) means? Is it better for a plasmonic material to have less ε(int)?

2. What does "Plasma Frequency of a metal in eV" means here?

3. What does ω(int) in eV means? Is it better to have more value of ω(int) in eV to be a better Plasmonic material?

4. What does dumping rate in eV means? How it effect the property of a plasmonic material?

5. What does happen if the light is incident to a plasmonic material below or more than plasmon frequency? Why this plasmon frequency is that so important?

6. In a plasmonic material, the prime target is scattering of light? Why not absorption or transmission? What will be the problem if the light will be either absorbed or transmitted?

I will be very much grateful if someone can give my answers. Also, if anyone can suggest any paper or, textbook where I can get those answers, I will be really so grateful.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any book on solid state theory should contain a chapter which explains most of the questions you are asking for, especially the meaning of plasma frequency, dielectric constant of a metal and its relation to the frequency of surface plasmons. Try e.g. Ashcroft and Mermin, Solid state physics.
 
Thank you DrDu

But it would be great if you can tell me now, what is ω (int) in eV means? It might be connected to Interband loss of a metal. If you can let me know about how it is related to Interband loss. And which one is better plasmonic metal actually with having ω (int) 3.2 or 1.2?

Thanking you in advance
 
I am not a specialist on plasmonics. I may be that ω(int) is the band gap.
Where did you find all these parameters? Are you referring to a specific article?
Would be helpful to have some background information.
I think you can't say absolutely which combination of the parameters makes a better plasmonic material. It rather depends on the frequency range you want your material to operate.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top