Comparing K and k in Hecht's Optics Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter manimaran1605
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between propagation number (K) and wave number (k) as defined in Hecht's Optics book. K is defined as 2π/λ, representing angular propagation in radians/m, while k is defined as 1/λ, indicating cycles/m. Despite having similar units, the two serve different purposes in wave equations, with K often used in contexts involving angular frequency. The notation can be confusing, especially with the use of different symbols (K, k, and κ). Understanding these differences is crucial for correctly applying wave equations in optics.
manimaran1605
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between propagation number(K) and wave number(k) described in Optics book written by hecht

He defined K=2π/λ and k=1/λ and both of them have the same units (i.e, meter inverse)
What does wave number of a Harmonic function tells about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The units look the same, but they aren't quite the same. It's a somewhat confusing notation in my opinion (especially when you use 'K' and 'k'!)

K=2π/λ is in units of radians/m and k=1/λ has units cycles/m, where "radians" and "cycles" are usually omitted. You just have to remember which kind of units you're using, so you know whether there needs to be a factor of 2π inside the sine/cosine/exponential.

For example, a wave of "propagation number(K)" would be sin(Kx), while a wave with "wave number(k)" would be sin(2πkx).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
manimaran1605 said:
[Hecht] defined [propagation number] K=2π/λ and [wave number] k=1/λ

You have it backwards. He defines the propagation number as ##k = 2 \pi / \lambda## (lower-case Latin letter "k") and the wave number as ##\kappa = 1 / \lambda## (lower-case Greek letter "kappa", not upper-case Latin letter "K"). Those different symbols (##k##, ##\kappa##, and ##K## in LaTeX; or k, κ, and K in PF's default font) tend to confuse people. Look carefully! :smile:

As olivermsun noted, the units are different. ##k## is much more commonly used. ##\kappa## is mainly used by spectroscopists. I don't know if they have a practical reason for it, or if it's just a historical convention.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The ##k = 2 \pi / \lambda## version is often convenient for working with waves when you also use the angular frequency ##\omega = 2 \pi / T## (where ##T## is the wave period).

That way, you can write things like ##e^{i(kx - \omega t)}## without having ##2\pi##s all over the place. :smile:
 
olivermsun said:
That way, you can write things like ##e^{i(kx - \omega t)}## without having ##2\pi##s all over the place. :smile:

Exactly. The OP (manimaran1605) should compare equation (2.24) in Hecht with the other equations in that group on page 16, which are different ways of writing the same wave equation using different combinations of constants.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top