Mathematica Comparing Maple and Mathematica: Pros & Cons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Mathematica
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a comparison between Maple and Mathematica, with users expressing their preferences based on personal experience. One user favors Maple for its intuitive mathematical interface and ease of use, particularly for tasks like 3D graphing and multiple integration, which were beneficial in their calculus class. Another user prefers Mathematica, citing its power and simplicity once familiar with its commands, despite acknowledging that it can be annoying initially. Overall, both programs are recognized for their capabilities, but preferences vary based on user experience and specific functionalities.
Angelos
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have a simply question...Which program is better and why? Maple or Mathematica?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maple, because that is the only one of the two to which I have access.
 
I prefer mathematica. To me, it seems rather powerful and simple once you get used to the annoying commands.
 
I decided on male a while back because it had a more intuitive/ mathematical interface, and didn't make you use commands for 99% of its functions. however I have never used or seen a copy of mathematica so I could be wrong.
 
I have only used maple, and it takes some getting used to but is definitely a very powerful program, we used it quite a lot in my calc 3 class as far as graphing in 3 dimensions, and doing multiple Integration and/or flux-divergence work
 
Back
Top