Comparing Nuclear and Neutrino Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMGoBuffs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the future of nuclear physics and neutrino physics, particularly in the context of potential funding and research opportunities over the next two decades. Uncertainties in the national budget pose challenges for these fields, with concerns that funding cuts could lead to the closure of facilities like Jefferson Lab, while Brookhaven may remain operational. Despite these worries, there is optimism regarding the construction of the Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) and the upcoming operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), suggesting a more promising outlook for low energy nuclear physics compared to high energy physics. The future of neutrino detectors and experiments remains uncertain, highlighting the need for ongoing assessment of funding trends and research priorities in these areas.
WMGoBuffs
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I've got a couple options for summer research, and I was wondering what the board's views on the fields of nuclear physics and neutrino physics were. Where do you think these two fields will go in the next twenty years? Will they be funded regardless of the next US administration? Is there decent money in it?

Just a few light questions...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say where nuclear and particle physics will be in 20 years in this country due to uncertainties in the national budget.
A while back there was an article in Science about in a worst case funding situation the DOE would shut down Jefferson Lab and keep Brookhaven open. This would be a major blow to the nuclear physics community but I don't think we will necessarily see a worst case funding scenario.
On the brighter side I think the Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) is still going to be built and the SNS will be operational in a few years. So to me it appears the future of low energy nuclear physics is possibly brighter than high energy nuclear physics. I'm not sure what the future holds for neutrino detectors & experiments in this country.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Back
Top