Comparing Standing Waves, Beats & Interference of Waves

AI Thread Summary
Standing waves result from two waves of the same frequency and amplitude moving in opposite directions, leading to no energy transfer, unlike normal interference where energy is transferred with the resultant wave. Beats occur when two waves with slightly different frequencies interfere, creating a time-varying pattern rather than a static one. In standing waves, all particles reach maxima simultaneously, while in normal interference, maxima occur at different times and locations, indicating wave propagation. The distinction of beats lies in their temporal variation and the perceptual blending of frequencies, which can be observed in both sound and light waves. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping wave behavior in various physical contexts.
raghavK.dua
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1)What is the difference between standing waves,beats and normal interference of any 2 waves ?
2)Is beats in sound waves same as interference in light waves ?
3)Why do we represent particle displacement with y and wave motion with x in longitudnal waves in which both particle and wave motion occur in same direction ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi raghavK.dua! welcome to pf! :smile:
raghavK.dua said:
2)Is beats in sound waves same as interference in light waves ?

basically, yes
3)Why do we represent particle displacement with y and wave motion with x in longitudnal waves in which both particle and wave motion occur in same direction ?

you have to call them something

what else would you call them?

you could use x and xrel

but x and y is much easier to write :wink:
1)What is the difference between standing waves,beats and normal interference of any 2 waves ?

tell us what you think, and then we'll comment! :smile:
 
raghavK.dua said:
3)Why do we represent particle displacement with y and wave motion with x in longitudnal waves in which both particle and wave motion occur in same direction ?
I often use 'u' as particle displacement. no real reason, except that I don't like using y.
 
tiny-tim said:
tell us what you think, and then we'll comment! :smile:

As far as I have understood for beats the 2 waves should have nearly same frequency.In standing waves 2 waves of same frequency and amplitude moving in opposite direction have to interfere.My questions are:-

1)After normal interference transfer of energy takes place as the resultant wave travels but in standing wave no transfer of energy takes place.why?

2)In standing waves all the particle achieve maxima at same instant why doesn't this happen in a wave which is formed due to normal interference.

3)Point of maxima and minima are there in every type of wave what's so special about beats ?
 
raghavK.dua said:
3)Point of maxima and minima are there in every type of wave what's so special about beats ?

Beats are a variation in time, as opposed to the unchanging interference pattern when only one frequency is involved. The pattern from two or more sources with different frequencies will be in motion all the time. It will consist of moving Moiree type fringes, the spacing and speed will relate to the frequency difference.
 
Beats are the result of interfering two waves with slightly different frequencies.
 
raghavK.dua said:
As far as I have understood for beats the 2 waves should have nearly same frequency.In standing waves 2 waves of same frequency and amplitude moving in opposite direction have to interfere.My questions are:-

1)After normal interference transfer of energy takes place as the resultant wave travels but in standing wave no transfer of energy takes place.why?
The 2 waves that make up the standing wave have equal flux magnitudes but in opposite directions (\textbf{F} and -\textbf{F}), so that the net flux is -\textbf{F} + \textbf{F} = \textbf{0}.

2)In standing waves all the particle achieve maxima at same instant why doesn't this happen in a wave which is formed due to normal interference.
Well, one way to think of it is that if the wave crests (maxima) were observed at different places at different times, then the combined wave would be propagating and not standing.

3)Point of maxima and minima are there in every type of wave what's so special about beats ?
I suppose beats are interesting for lots of reasons, one of which is that they come straight out of trig identities, but they have an interesting real-world presentation as well. When you put together two waves which are close together in frequency, you typically stop perceiving the waves separately and instead notice the "average" wave and its beats. Similarly with "spatial" beats, which also happen.
 
Back
Top