I Comparing Water and Ice Melting for fighting fires

LURCH

Science Advisor
2,535
111
Ok, that didn’t take long.
NBC News:
https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/amp/ncna820966
CNET:
https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/californias-fires-face-a-new-high-tech-foe-drones/
Fortune:
http://amp.timeinc.net/fortune/2018/11/29/drones-wildfires-california-drones
And this one from Fox News is exactly what I was thinking:
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hl=en-us&ei=uWGUXIjwKNX8jwS-l6DgCQ&q=wildfires+aerial+drones+fox+news&oq=wildfires+aerial+drones+fox+news&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.3..33i299.1513941.1518269..1518775...0.0..0.355.984.8j3-1......0....1.........0i71j33i22i29i30j33i160.8Qq9_JwL3Kc

A lot more results. Many agencies are working on this, with some of them putting real fire-fighting drones in the air within the year (drones for surveillance of fires are already in use).

Problem with this, of course, is that it will be some time before this tech is widely available.
 
They "stole" my idea about the dirt thrower! I knew I shoulda patented it!
 

256bits

Gold Member
2,687
699
A lot more results. Many agencies are working on this, with some of them putting real fire-fighting drones in the air within the year (drones for surveillance of fires are already in use).
The lack of drones isn't the problem - it can crash the same as a pilot controlled plane.
The air currents close to and above the fire are the problem.

Keeping an aircraft airborne - someone has to make a decisions regarding safety and effectiveness of deploying water bombers ( as well as ground crew ).
The water bomber has to be able to get low so that the drop of water does not dissipate before reaching the target. For an aggressive fire, that is difficult to do.
The fire in question was so aggressive that it was unsafe for people as well as machinery to be close to the fire front either on the ground or in the air.
The decision to ground the aircraft was done for safety reasons, as well as that the water drops from a height that would be flyable would imprint on dousing of the fire. - the water would evaporate before hitting the ground.
See post 19 for a review of the fire in question.
We are not talking 100's of feet, but thousands, even tens of thousands for safe flying. for an aggressive fire.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Comparing Water and Ice Melting for fighting fires" You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Top Threads

Top