Comparison of Different Mammalian Brains

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comparison
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of mammalian brains, particularly focusing on their size, neuronal counts, and the implications for cognitive abilities. Participants explore various aspects of brain anatomy and functionality, including the encephalization quotient and synaptic connections, while referencing specific examples from different species.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that estimates of neuronal numbers in different species are difficult and may not be consistent.
  • Others highlight the sophisticated behaviors of crows, suggesting that intelligence may not correlate directly with brain size.
  • A participant describes observations of crows using tools and strategizing, indicating complex cognitive processes.
  • There is mention of the encephalization quotient as a measure of brain size relative to body mass, with some questioning the accuracy of neuronal count estimates.
  • Concerns are raised about the graphical representation of brain images, with some participants suggesting inconsistencies in orientation.
  • Discussion includes the potential for synaptic connections to be a better measure of cognitive ability than mere neuronal count.
  • Some participants argue that the cerebellum's size and function in different species may also play a role in understanding cognitive capabilities.
  • There is a debate about the anatomical orientation of brains in the images presented, with differing opinions on whether they are accurately represented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of brain size and neuronal counts, as well as the graphical representation of brain images. There is no consensus on the implications of these factors for understanding cognitive abilities across species.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in the accuracy of neuronal counts and the potential for graphical inconsistencies in the representation of brain anatomy. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of how brain structure relates to cognitive function.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,769
Reaction score
12,184
This shows brains from several different (mostly primates and rodents) at the same scale. Obtained from here.
The weight is listed in grams, the (purported) number of neurons is in millions(M). Estimates of neuronal numbers are difficult. Sadly they are not all pointing the same direction.

fnhum-03-031-g003.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and Drakkith
Biology news on Phys.org
Then there are crows, average sized birds with pea sized brains.
I have seen crows finding a resources such as rubbish bin, and shortly several other crows get invited to the find.
That seems to me to be pretty sophisticated behaviour.
 
Crow are pretty amazing. Some are known for tool use.

I spent a bit of time a couple of years ago watching a couple of crows trying to outsmart each other.
One had a walnut and was trying to drop it on the street to break it, so it could eat the insides. It had to get pretty high to get a good impact.
The other crow was following the first crow around so that it could beat it to the nut when it broke.
The crow with the nut was using a variety of strategies to fake out the second one is it would be the first to the ground where the nut landed.
I never saw them break it open though.
 
There is an old concept: encephalization quotient. This seems to be a pretty good graphic interpretation of that. Thanks.

By 'they are not all pointing in the same direction' I'm guessing you mean mass, e.g., agouti is an outlier. Maybe the neuronal count estimate has a problem?
 
Read the linked article. They are indeed modeling EQ.
 
jim mcnamara said:
By 'they are not all pointing in the same direction' I'm guessing you mean mass, e.g., agouti is an outlier. Maybe the neuronal count estimate has a problem?

Nope. Sorry, my poor wording.
The anterior ends of the brains are not all on the left or right side.

Bottom row, anterior is to the: left.
Row above, from left to right, anterior is the: right, left, left
Next row up, anterior is to the: right, left, right, left, left
Top row, anterior is to the: right, right, left, left, right, left, right

It is graphically inconsistent, which really bugs me.

It is interesting though that the agouti has more mass but fewer neurons than the galago or owl monkey.
 
Well, since they could run out and just dissect out the needed brains they probably were stuck with images they already had - although I guess it would have been possible to photoshop some of them. My thinking is that messing with scientific images in that sense is not an ethical approach.

Hmm.
 
I think it would be pretty easy and not affect the integrity of the images to flip them to the opposite direction.
 
Would be interesting to know the extent of synaptic connections in each. The purkinje neuron in the human brain, for example, has about 20,000 connections. I wonder if any of the other mammalian brains come even close to this number. And even more so, how extensive the connections are fed-back in each brain. I went though the article and the number of connections were only mentioned in passing. Seems to me a better ranking of cognition are these two parameters and I suspect the human brain is more so than any other.
 
  • #10
Lots of (or all) vertebrates have Purkinje cells. They are the main output neuron from the cerebellum. It would not surprise me if other mammals have similar number of synapses on their Purkinje cells.

The cerebellum is a large structure found a the back of the brain in all vertebrates. Most fish have small cerebellums, but it gets really large in mammals and birds. The cerebellum is mostly associated with coordination of muscle activity and dealing with sensory inputs, in particular from ear (hearing), vestibular structures (balance), and the lateral line (only in fish and amphibians). Some fish (such as electro-receptive fish) also have large cerebellums.

The cerebral cortex (in the cerebrum) is what is usually associated with "smarts". It is often compared based on surface area, numbers of layers, neuron count, and synapses.
 
  • #11
It looks graphically consistent with the way the brains sit inside the skulls of all the animals displayed. Each image looks like an anterior/left to posterior/right perspective to me. All like so:
3D_model_anat_skull_web1.jpg


The ones that seem off, like the squirrel monkey, are because the brain sits that way backwards inside the skull.
product-740-main-main-big-1415040534.jpg
 
  • #12
Fervent Freyja said:
The ones that seem off, like the squirrel monkey, are because the brain sits that way backwards inside the skull.
There are no brains I know of that sit backwards in their skulls.
The human (and some monkeys) brain would have its spinal cord going in a more downward direction than in most mammals, if it were shown (like it is in the macaque or owl monkey).
The squirrel monkey brain has it anterior to the left. The olfactory bulb is a little blip at the very anterior-most end (left).

Anatomical cues for anterior vs. posterior include the locations of:
Spinal cord (at posterior end, ventral, in many shown extends past the cerebellum).
Cerebellum (small parallel gyri (or gyruses) or branchy cauliflower like structure if sectioned), posterior to the cerebral hemispheres, above the hindbrain/spinal cord.
Olfactory bulb (blob-like structure, very variable sizes and shapes in different species); at anterior end.
Division in the cerebrum between the temporal lobe and pariental/frontal lobes of brain (when shown) slopes up as it goes posterior.

http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v2/n11/images/nprot.2007.393-F1.jpg. The cerebrum, cerebral hemispheres, and cerebral cortex are components of the telencephalon in this picture.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K