Compensate for Large Temperature Swings in Fluxgate Applications

AI Thread Summary
Compensating for large temperature swings in fluxgate magnetometers can be achieved through various analog and digital methods without relying on temperature sensors. Techniques discussed include using temperature compensation circuits, adjusting gain settings dynamically, and employing feedback mechanisms to stabilize readings. Participants emphasize the importance of maintaining consistent magnetic field detection across varying temperatures. Several suggest exploring passive components and circuit design modifications to enhance stability. Ultimately, achieving reliable performance in fluctuating temperatures requires innovative approaches in circuit design.
akhurash
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what different method's there are for compensating for large temperature swings in a fluxgate magnetometer and obtain a consistent and repeatable value. I’m trying to obtain this without using a temperature sensor; I would like to use analog or digital components to do this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What I mean is that I want to be able to detect a constant field in different temperatures without reading a temperature from a temperature sensor and using a micro-controller.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top