Complete preorders (and other binary relations)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the terminology used in set theory for complete preorders, which are transitive and total relations that need not be antisymmetric. Participants mention the term "weak order" and seek clarification on whether "total preorder" is a more appropriate term. The concept of a "complete relation" is explored, with agreement that it involves the condition where either xRy or yRx holds for every pair in the set. Additionally, one user shares their work on a spreadsheet detailing the logarithmic values of various combinations of properties for labeled binary relations, having identified 17 interesting combinations. The conversation highlights the need for clear terminology and the complexity of counting complete relations.
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
Is there a commonly-used name for a complete preorder (a transitive and total relation, Sloan's A000670 and A011782 for labeled and unlabeled, respectively) within set theory? (Not a total order, mind you -- it need not be antisymmetric.) I've heard the term "weak order", but that's from the same field that uses "linear order" for total orders, so I wanted some clarification if anyone knows of something else.

Also, does anyone know about counting the number of elements in complete relations? Götz Pfeiffer has an excellent paper Counting Transitive Relations about counting transitive relations (mentioning 26 classes of relations along the way), but he doesn't touch on the slightly-more-manegable complete relations at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've heard the term "total preorder".

What's a "complete relation"? I've not heard the term before. Is it one where at least one of xRy and yRx is true?
 
Hurkyl said:
I've heard the term "total preorder".

What's a "complete relation"? I've not heard the term before. Is it one where at least one of xRy and yRx is true?

Ah, yes, that's the term. I knew I had heard something like that, thanks.

Yes, xRy V yRx for every x, y in the set. What do you call that, totality?


In any case, on the second part of my question, I've been putting together a spreadsheet with the values (actually their logarithms, since otherwise they'd be prohibitively large) of combinations of properties for labeled binary relations. With C = complete/total, R = reflexive, S = symmetric, T = transitive, and A = antisymmetric, I have all 17 interesting combinations figured out now:
--, R, C, S, RS, T, TA, ST, RT, CT, CTA, A, RA, CA, STA, RTA, RST

I have a OEIS number for each one (with modification if needed), and values at least as far as Sloan's sequences go (and further in some cases).
 
Last edited:
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
253
Views
33K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top