Complex analysis conjugation help

CrazyCalcGirl
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f(z) is analytic at a point Zo show that the Conjugate(f(z conjugate)) is also analytic there. (The bar is over the z and the entire thing as well.)



The Attempt at a Solution



I know if a function is analytic at Zo if it is differentiable in some neighborhood of Zo. I also know the Cauchy Riemann equations would hold there. I also know that the partial with respect to Z conjugate is zero. I guess I am having trouble with the double conjugation here and what kind of formal argument to make.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write z=x+iy and f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y). If conjugate(f(conjugate(z))=U(x,y)+iV(x,y) can you write U and V in terms of u and v? You know the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold for u and v, can you show they also hold for U and V?
 
Dick said:
Write z=x+iy and f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y). If conjugate(f(conjugate(z))=U(x,y)+iV(x,y) can you write U and V in terms of u and v? You know the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold for u and v, can you show they also hold for U and V?

I'd just like to point out that proving U and V satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations isn't enough to show that f is holomorphic (you need continuous partials which you might not have).

Go directly to the definition of a derivative. Look at the difference quotient and see if you can manipulate the conjugates to make it look like the derivative of f. It won't be exact, but you can turn it into a limit that you know exists
 
Office_Shredder said:
I'd just like to point out that proving U and V satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations isn't enough to show that f is holomorphic (you need continuous partials which you might not have).

Go directly to the definition of a derivative. Look at the difference quotient and see if you can manipulate the conjugates to make it look like the derivative of f. It won't be exact, but you can turn it into a limit that you know exists

Why would you think continuity of partial derivatives would be a problem? f is given to be analytic in a neighborhood of z0. It has derivatives of all orders.
 
Dick said:
Why would you think continuity of partial derivatives would be a problem? f is given to be analytic in a neighborhood of z0. It has derivatives of all orders.


I did get it to satisfy the Cauchy Riemann conditions. I think since f(z) is given to be analytic that we already know it has continuous first partials at U and V. The conjugate will obviously also have this as well.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top