I Complex Analysis, holomorphic in circle.

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
Hi, I have a question regarding corollary 2.3. in the uploaded image.

it looks very trivial to me becauese Cauchy's theorem states "if f(z) is holomorphic, its closed loop integral
will be always 0". Is this what the author is trying to say? what's the necesseity of the larger disk D' at here?
Why do we use D'?
 

Attachments

  • 스크린샷 2016-07-23 6.58.15 PM.png
    스크린샷 2016-07-23 6.58.15 PM.png
    75.4 KB · Views: 511
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You understand right, just do not bother about that. Usually such a type argument (about D') is already contained in the proof of the Cauchy theorem. Look above how they formulate Cauchy theorem.

kidsasd987 said:
"if f(z) is holomorphic, its closed loop integral
will be always 0".
the loop must be in the domain where f is holomorphic and this loop must be shrinkable in this domain. and the loop must be contained compactly in the domain
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top