Complex analysis: mapping a hyperbola onto a line

Grothard
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We want to create a map from (x,y) to (u,v) such that the right side (positive x) of the hyperbola x^2 - y^2 = 1 is mapped onto the line v = 0 AND all the points to the left of that hyperbola are mapped to above the line. The mapping should be one-to-one and conformal


Homework Equations



I think (but am not 100% sure) the map has to be from z = x+iy to w = u+iv, so it's important to define x and y in terms of z. I figured out that x = (z+conj(z))/2 and y = (z-conj(z))/2

The Attempt at a Solution



We can map y directly to u through u = y. That should be sufficient I think.
v = x^2 - y^2 - 1 does map the parabola onto the line (it makes v = 0) but it maps the points to the right of the parabola onto above the line, so we multiply by -1 to get v = y^2 - x^2 + 1. We can write everything as:

w = y + i(y^2 - x^2 + 1) and then substitute the x = (z+conj(z))/2 and y = (z-conj(z))/2 into make it a function of z.

This seems to work for when x >= 0, but it fails to map some points on the left side of the y-axis (all of which should be mapped to above the line v = 0). This is because the function x^2 - y^2 = 1 describes two parabolas, and we have to somehow mathematically disregard the left one. I'm not sure how to do that. Could somebody please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You aren't really dealing with this as a complex function yet. You have got that v(x,y)=x^2-y^2-1 if f(z)=u(x,y)+i*v(x,y) where z=x+iy.That's a start. Now shouldn't you think about using the Cauchy-Riemann equations to figure out what u(x,y) might be and then try to deduce what f(z) might be?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top