Complex dielectric constant -- metals, insulators and Reflections

AI Thread Summary
The complex dielectric constant is essential for understanding how electromagnetic waves interact with different materials, particularly in terms of reflectivity and absorption. High values of the extinction coefficient (K) indicate high reflectivity (R), which is typical for metals due to their high free electron density. Insulators generally exhibit low values of K, resulting in lower reflectivity. The complex part of the dielectric constant, particularly ε2, is linked to the material's absorption characteristics, which arise from the density of free electrons. Understanding these relationships is crucial for modeling absorptive materials in electromagnetic applications.
Carlos de Meo
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Hi everyone
Can anyone help me understanding the physical meaning for the complex dielectric constant?
Assuming a electromagnetic wave from air to a conductor, the following equation is valid
R= ((n-1)2+k2)/((n+1)2+k2) where K is the extinction coefficient (the complex part of the complex refraction index)
So, High K means high R
K= ((ε12+ε22)1/2-ε1)1/2
As far as i know, metals tend to exhibit high reflectivity due to high values of K, correct?
And insulators in general, low values of K, also correct?
So, according to some literature, the high values of K comes from high values of ε2. Also correct?
And, to finish, where does the ε2 comes from, is it due to high free electrons density?
Thank you very much for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carlos de Meo said:
Hi everyone
Can anyone help me understanding the physical meaning for the complex dielectric constant?

Allowing the dielectric constant/permittivity/permeability/etc. to be complex-valued is a way to model absorptive materials. Recall that an electromagnetic wave propagates through media with a phase term exp(ikz), so if k is complex-valued, the amplitude decreases exponentially with propagation distance.

There are a few wrinkles to this- left handed materials, for example.
 
  • Like
Likes Carlos de Meo
And the complex part of these models comes from the absorption due to the high free electrons density?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top