Complex dielectric constant -- metals, insulators and Reflections

AI Thread Summary
The complex dielectric constant is essential for understanding how electromagnetic waves interact with different materials, particularly in terms of reflectivity and absorption. High values of the extinction coefficient (K) indicate high reflectivity (R), which is typical for metals due to their high free electron density. Insulators generally exhibit low values of K, resulting in lower reflectivity. The complex part of the dielectric constant, particularly ε2, is linked to the material's absorption characteristics, which arise from the density of free electrons. Understanding these relationships is crucial for modeling absorptive materials in electromagnetic applications.
Carlos de Meo
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Hi everyone
Can anyone help me understanding the physical meaning for the complex dielectric constant?
Assuming a electromagnetic wave from air to a conductor, the following equation is valid
R= ((n-1)2+k2)/((n+1)2+k2) where K is the extinction coefficient (the complex part of the complex refraction index)
So, High K means high R
K= ((ε12+ε22)1/2-ε1)1/2
As far as i know, metals tend to exhibit high reflectivity due to high values of K, correct?
And insulators in general, low values of K, also correct?
So, according to some literature, the high values of K comes from high values of ε2. Also correct?
And, to finish, where does the ε2 comes from, is it due to high free electrons density?
Thank you very much for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carlos de Meo said:
Hi everyone
Can anyone help me understanding the physical meaning for the complex dielectric constant?

Allowing the dielectric constant/permittivity/permeability/etc. to be complex-valued is a way to model absorptive materials. Recall that an electromagnetic wave propagates through media with a phase term exp(ikz), so if k is complex-valued, the amplitude decreases exponentially with propagation distance.

There are a few wrinkles to this- left handed materials, for example.
 
  • Like
Likes Carlos de Meo
And the complex part of these models comes from the absorption due to the high free electrons density?
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top