Undergrad Complex Exponential solutions in time invariant systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of time translational invariance in coupled oscillators, specifically the equation x(t+c) = f(c)x(t). The differentiation of this equation with respect to c, followed by setting c=0, leads to the differential equation d/dt[x(t)] = (omega)x(t), where omega is the derivative of f(c) evaluated at c=0. The exponential solution x(t) = exp^(omega)(t) is confirmed as valid, and the confusion regarding the time derivative of f(c) is clarified, emphasizing that f is a function of one variable. The relevance of Noether's theorem in this context is questioned, with no clear conservation laws identified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled oscillators
  • Familiarity with time translational invariance
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's theorem in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in differential equations
  • Research time-invariant systems in physics
  • Learn about the role of exponential functions in solutions to differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on dynamical systems, coupled oscillators, and mathematical methods in physics.

Dagorodir
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there! First Post :D

In a recent CM module we've been looking at coupled oscillators and the role of time translational invariance in the description of such physical systems. I will present the statement that I am having trouble understanding and then continue to elaborate.

In stating that a system has a time translational invariance, it follows that

x(t+c) = f(c)x(t)

where x(t) is some function of time, f(c) is some function of proportionality dependent on some constant c, and therefore x(t+c) is the function x at some later time.

After this, it is stated that differentiating with respect to c and setting c=0 gives

d/dt[x(t)] = (omega) x(t) where (omega) = d/dt[ f(c=0) ]

It's then given that x(t) = exp^(omega)(t)I can clearly see that the exponential form is a solution to differential equation above. My question is how is the differential equation derived with no known form of x(t)? In particular, how does the time derivative of f(c) come into the equation if f(c) is only dependent on c? (I understand that the chain and product rules must be used but wouldn't the time derivative of f(c) return a zero value?)

As well as this, some friends have alluded to Noether's theorem as the governance of this particular rule; is this warranted? I don't see any particular conservation laws here.

Any help or insight is much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dagorodir,
The first thing you say is done is the differentiating with respect to c.
If you do this, you should get:
##\frac{\partial}{\partial c}x(t+c) = f'(c)x(t)##
Setting c to zero, you get
##\frac{\partial}{\partial c}x(t+0) = f'(0)x(t)##
Now, notice that if you set dt = dc, then
## x(t+dt) = x(t+dc)##
So, at c=0,
##\frac{\partial}{\partial c}x(t+c) = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}x(t+c)##
Then you can jump to the conclusion:
##\frac{\partial}{\partial t}x(t) = f'(0)x(t)##
Where ##f'(0) = \omega##.
I think that the only problem in the explanation you posted was in using d/dt (f(c)) to define omega. f is a function of one variable, and you want to find its derivative evaluated at 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Dagorodir
Hi RUber,

Thanks for your reply!

Your explanation makes sense to me; I think that I was failing to make the link between the derivatives and therefore using the fact that c is a constant to get over the last hurdle.

Thanks again
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K