Complex Line Integral (should be easy)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the complex line integral ∫C dz/(z²+1) for z in the right half-plane, demonstrating that it equals i/2 Log(z+i) - i/2 Log(z-i) + π/2. Participants emphasize the importance of using partial fraction decomposition, specifically factoring z²+1 into (z+i)(z-i). The conversation also highlights the significance of understanding branch cuts and the analyticity of the antiderivative along the integration path, suggesting that the integral can be simplified by evaluating the antiderivative at its endpoints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Partial fraction decomposition techniques
  • Understanding of branch cuts and branch points
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions in the complex plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex logarithms, specifically Log(z) = ln(z) + i Arg(z)
  • Learn about the analyticity of functions and how it applies to complex integrals
  • Explore the concept of branch cuts in complex analysis
  • Practice evaluating complex integrals using partial fraction decomposition
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone involved in evaluating complex integrals and understanding their properties.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Using a partial fraction decomposition, show that if z lies in the right half plane and C is the line segment from 0 to z, then

C dz/(z2+1) = i/2 Log(z+i) - i/2 Log(z-i) + π/2​

Homework Equations



Log(z) = ln(z) + i Arg(z) (maybe relevant?)

The Attempt at a Solution



C dz/(z2+1) = -1/2 ∫C dz/(z+1) + 1/2 ∫C dz/(z-1) = -1/2 Log(z+1) + 1/2 Log(z+1) ... This isn't looking promising. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not doing the partial fractions correctly. You got i's in there you know. Factor z^2+1 and get:

[tex]\frac{1}{z^2+1}=\frac{1}{(z+i)(z-i)}[/tex]

now do the partial fractions and then consider the analyticity of the antiderivative along the integration path. Did I just say that? Jesus, what does that even mean? Where are the branch cuts in all of this? branch-points? Do we even need them? Why don't we just try an easier one first like just:

[tex]\int_0^1 \frac{dz}{z-i}[/tex]

that 's easy right? It's just:

[tex]\int_0^1 \frac{dz}{z-i}=\text{mylog}(z-i)\biggr|_0^1[/tex]

with mylog just being an analytic part of the multivalued function log(z-i). Say we define it as:

[tex]\text{mylog}(z-i)=\ln|z-i|+i\theta,\quad -\pi<\theta\leq \pi[/tex]

where theta is the argument (within that range above, of the quantity z-i. So z starts at 0 so then the argument of (0-i) is just -\pi/2. That's within range. Now say z=1/4 +1/4 i so arg of 1/4-3/4 i is what? I don't know exactly. You figure it out but it's in the fourth quadrant so still in range. Same way with the entire length of the integration path: the argument is always within that range above and never crosses the branch-cut along the negative real axis so mylog is analytic along the entire path of integration so therefore I can evaluate the integral by evaluating the antiderivative at it's end points and write:

[tex]\int_0^1 \frac{dz}{z-i}=\text{mylog}(z-i)\biggr|_0^1=\text{mylog}(1-i)-\text{mylog}(-i)[/tex]

You not gettin' confussed with that mylog thing right? It's just log ok, or rather the piece of it I define above. You can do the other one. Also, see this thread about using parts of log. Make sure you understand what's going on.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=552090
 
Last edited:
I see what's going on now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K