MHB Complex numbers and conjugates

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that two complex numbers, z and w, must be conjugates given the equation (x-z)(x-w) = ax² + bx + c, where a, b, and c are real. The user correctly identifies that a = 1, -b = w + z, and c = wz. It is established that for the sum of the imaginary parts (q + s) to equal zero, s must equal -q, leading to the conclusion that the real parts (p and r) must also be equal. Ultimately, this demonstrates that z and w are indeed complex conjugates of each other.
Sean1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sean said:
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.

Hi Sean,

The three equations you have obtained are correct. Substitute for $w$ and $z$ in these equations. For example,

\[-b=w+z\Rightarrow (p+qi)+(r+si)=-b\Rightarrow (p+r)+i(q+s)=-b\]

Since $-b$ is a real number what can you say about $q+s$ which is the imaginary part?
 
Sean said:
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.

Remember that b and c are real. The only way you can add two complex numbers to get a real number is if the imaginary parts cancel out, so $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{I}\,(z) = -\mathcal{I}\,(w) \end{align*}$.

Now if you write $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z = p + \mathrm{i}\,q \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} w = r + \mathrm{i}\,s \end{align*}$ (where p,q,r,s are all real), then we have already shown that s = -q, giving $\displaystyle \begin{align*} w = r - \mathrm{i}\,q \end{align*}$. Multiplying z and w gives

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} w\,z &= \left( r - \mathrm{i}\,q \right) \left( p + \mathrm{i}\,q \right) \\ &= p\,r + \mathrm{i}\,q\,r - \mathrm{i}\,p\,q - \mathrm{i}^2\, q^2 \\ &= p\,r + q^2 + \mathrm{i} \, \left( q\,r - p\,q \right) \end{align*}$

For this to be real,

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} q\,r - p\,q &= 0 \\ q \, \left( r - p \right) &= 0 \\ q = 0 \textrm{ or } r - p &= 0 \\ q = 0 \textrm{ or } p &= r \end{align*}$

Therefore, if w and z are nonreal, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{R}\,(z) = \mathcal{R}\,(w) \end{align*}$.

This has shown that w and z must be complex conjugates.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K