MHB Complex numbers and conjugates

Sean1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sean said:
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.

Hi Sean,

The three equations you have obtained are correct. Substitute for $w$ and $z$ in these equations. For example,

\[-b=w+z\Rightarrow (p+qi)+(r+si)=-b\Rightarrow (p+r)+i(q+s)=-b\]

Since $-b$ is a real number what can you say about $q+s$ which is the imaginary part?
 
Sean said:
Hi everyone,

Can you please assist with the following problem?

The complex numbers z and w are such that for the real variable x,
(x-z)(x-w)=ax2+bx+c for real a,b and c.

By letting z=p+qi and w=r+si, prove that z and w must be conjugates of one another.So far, I have determined that a=1, -b=w+z and c=wz,
I know I need to show that q+s=0 and that p=r, but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for reading my post.

Remember that b and c are real. The only way you can add two complex numbers to get a real number is if the imaginary parts cancel out, so $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{I}\,(z) = -\mathcal{I}\,(w) \end{align*}$.

Now if you write $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z = p + \mathrm{i}\,q \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} w = r + \mathrm{i}\,s \end{align*}$ (where p,q,r,s are all real), then we have already shown that s = -q, giving $\displaystyle \begin{align*} w = r - \mathrm{i}\,q \end{align*}$. Multiplying z and w gives

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} w\,z &= \left( r - \mathrm{i}\,q \right) \left( p + \mathrm{i}\,q \right) \\ &= p\,r + \mathrm{i}\,q\,r - \mathrm{i}\,p\,q - \mathrm{i}^2\, q^2 \\ &= p\,r + q^2 + \mathrm{i} \, \left( q\,r - p\,q \right) \end{align*}$

For this to be real,

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} q\,r - p\,q &= 0 \\ q \, \left( r - p \right) &= 0 \\ q = 0 \textrm{ or } r - p &= 0 \\ q = 0 \textrm{ or } p &= r \end{align*}$

Therefore, if w and z are nonreal, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{R}\,(z) = \mathcal{R}\,(w) \end{align*}$.

This has shown that w and z must be complex conjugates.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top