Complex numbers: don't understand graph of 1/z

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding how to graph the function 1/z, where z is a complex number expressed as x + iy. After multiplying by the complex conjugate, the expression simplifies to (x - iy)/(x^2 + y^2). Participants highlight the complexity of graphing this function, suggesting that a full representation requires a four-dimensional graph or two separate 3D graphs for the real and imaginary parts. There is some confusion regarding the interpretation of the graph, particularly in terms of what is being plotted and the meaning of "whole number." Clarification on these points is needed for a more accurate understanding of the graphing process.
james5
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1/z is 1/(x+iy)

however, i then multiply by the complex conjugate and get:

(x-iy)/(x^2+y^2)

now, how do i graph this?

thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to graph? x versus y or what?
 
To fully graph it, you would need a 4-dimensional graph, with axes x,y,a,b, so that x+y\imath=\frac{1}{a+b\imath}.
You could have 2 3-D graphs, z=\Re\left({\frac{1}{x+y\imath}}\right) and z=\Im\left({\frac{1}{x+y\imath}}\right).
 
well, i think it's not that complex since the graph i made that is correct is just one that goes down diagonally... so, it's basically the graph of x-iy since x^2 and y^2 are basically a whole number...
 
james5 said:
well, i think it's not that complex since the graph i made that is correct is just one that goes down diagonally... so, it's basically the graph of x-iy since x^2 and y^2 are basically a whole number...

Perhaps it would be better if you explain what you are talking about! What do you mean by "basically a whole number"? And, as you were asked before, what exactly are you graphing?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top