Complex Numbers: Solving 2^(8n)exp^(2niπ)=2^(8n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter craig100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
craig100
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey again;
It doesn't seem to be my day for spotting the obvious;

I've come across this problem now:

2^{8n}\exp^{2ni\Pi} = 2^{8n}

This imples that exp^{2ni\Pi} = 1, i know that exp^{i\Pi} =-1, but is that related?

hmm, Latex issues...i'll try and fix them :) - sorted
Craig
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, using the exponential form: e^{2\pi i}=\cos(2\pi)+i\sin(2\pi)=1. So, e^{2\pi ni}=\cos(2n\pi)+i\sin(2n\pi) and since cos(2n pi)=cos(2 pi)=1, and sin(2n pi)=sin(2 pi)=0, the result exp(2ni pi)=1 is obtained
 
The relation to that famous identity is
e^{2i\pi}=(e^{i\pi})^2=(-1)^2=1.
 
Hi craig100,

you can visualize the complex number e^{i \theta} as a vector of length 1 that is rotated by an angle \theta with respect to the positive x-axis,
see .[/URL]

Also, see the section "Polar Form" here

The form z=r \cdot e^{i \theta} is also called polar form of the complex number z. The vector has the length r and an angle \theta with respect to the positive x axis.

If you visualize the complex number in that way, you can immediately see what value the complex number z will have for certain values such as
\theta = \pi/4, \pi/2, \pi, 2 \pi.

This example shows z=5 \cdot e^{i \pi /3}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
craig100 said:
This imples that exp^{2ni\Pi} = 1, i know that exp^{i\Pi} =-1, but is that related?

Best way to show how its related is Eighty's post.
 
Thank guys, quite simple afterall :smile:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top