Complex numbers, solving polynomial, signs of i

Platypus26
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm revising complex numbers and having trouble with this question...

Question:

Verify that 2 of the roots of the equation:

z^3 +2z^2 + z + 2 = 0

are i and -2. Find any remaining roots

Attempt at solution:

i^3 +2 i^2 + i + 2 =
(-1)i + 2(-1) +i + 2 =
-i -2 + i +2 =0
therefore i is a root

(-2)^3 +2(-2)^2 + (-2) + 2 =
-8 + 8 = 0
therefore -2 is a root


Let y be the remaining root to be found...

(z+i) (z-2)(z+y) = 0
(z^2 - 2z + iz -2i) (z+y) = 0
z^3 - 2z^2 + iz^2 -2iz +z^2 y -2zy +izy -2iy = 0

z^3 + (i+y-2) z^2 + (iy-2y-2i)z + (-2iy) = 0

so from this I should be able to work out y by equating the coefficients...
i + y-2 = 2 -> i+y = 4??
iy-2-2i = 1 iy - 2i = 3?
-2iy = 2 from this i think y=i but it doesn't seem to agree with the other equations.

This is where I'm stuck.
Does i multiplied by -i equal 1 or -1?
Also what is is (-i)^2 ?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the mistake is at the very beginning...
(z+i) (z-2)(z+y) = 0

The idea of factoring is that if you plug in a root, one of the factors will be zero. Therefore, you should always write (z - root). If +i and -2 are roots, then, you would get
(z-i)(z+2)(z-y) = 0

Does i multiplied by -i equal 1 or -1?
i * -i = -1 * i *i = -1 * -1 = 1

Also what is is (-i)^2 ?
(-i)^2 = i^2 = -1
just like
(-2)^2 = 2^2 = 4
 
Following up on what Compuchip said, if i and -2 are roots, z - i and z + 2 are factors, which means also that (z - i)(z + 2) is a factor. If you multiply this out and divide your original polynomial by it, you will get your third factor.
 
One thing that you should always be aware of is that if all the coefficients of a polynomial are real, then the complex roots will come in conjugate pairs. The conjugate of i is -i.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top