MHB Can you help me find the third zero of this complex polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheFallen018
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the third zero of a degree 3 complex polynomial, given one complex zero and its conjugate. The user initially misapplies the theorem regarding complex roots, believing that the remaining root must be real. However, it is clarified that the polynomial does not have real coefficients, allowing for the possibility of complex roots. The correct approach involves factoring the polynomial using the known zero, leading to the conclusion that the third zero is -1, which is a double root. The user expresses appreciation for the factoring method, indicating it simplifies the process of finding the roots.
TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too. So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1. None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.

View attachment 8177

Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_15.jpg
    Screenshot_15.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too. So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1. None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.
Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)

Hi Fallen number 18! ;)

The fact that $-1+2i$ is a zero means that we can factorize the polynomial as $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +az+b)$.
When we expand that and match it to the polynomial, we can deduce the values of $a$ and $b$.
Care to try?
 
TheFallen018 said:
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too.
No, you can't. The theorem you are misremembering is that "if z is a zero of a polynomial with real coefficients then so is its conjugate." But this polynomial does not have real coefficients.

So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1.
Well, yes, with z= -1, z^2= 1, and z^3= -1 so the polynomial becomes -1+ 3- 2i- 3+ 4i+ 1- 2i= (-1+ 3- 3+ 1)+ (-2i+ 4i- 2i)= 0.

None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.
Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)
The fact that -1+ 2i is a root means that x+ 1- 2i will divide into z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) evenly- with no remainder.

In fact, dividing z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) by z+ 1- 2i gives a quotient of z^2+ 2z+ 1= (z+ 1)^2. The zeros of z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) are -1 and -1+ 2i with -1 being a double zero.
 
Last edited:
I like Serena said:
Hi Fallen number 18! ;)

The fact that $-1+2i$ is a zero means that we can factorize the polynomial as $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +az+b)$.
When we expand that and match it to the polynomial, we can deduce the values of $a$ and $b$.
Care to try?

I actually already tried this method. I must have done something wrong the first time, because I didn't get the same answer when I did it just now. It worked out to be $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +2z+1)$ which worked nicely in the quadratic formula and got me the right answer. Thanks!

Country Boy said:
No, you can't. The theorem you are misremembering is that "if z is a zero of a polynomial with real coefficients then so is its conjugate." But this polynomial does not have real coefficients. Well, yes, with z= -1, z^2= 1, and z^3= -1 so the polynomial becomes -1+ 3- 2i- 3+ 4i+ 1- 2i= (-1+ 3- 3+ 1)+ (-2i+ 4i- 2i)= 0.The fact that -1+ 2i is a root means that x+ 1- 2i will divide into z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) evenly- with no remainder.

In fact, dividing z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) by z+ 1- 2i gives a quotient of z^2+ 2z+ 1= (z+ 1)^2. The zeros of z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) are -1 and -1+ 2i with -1 being a double zero.

I really like this method. It hadn't occurred to me to factorise the z terms that way. It makes dividing really easy, and then it's just a matter of using the quadratic formula. Thanks for the insight on this one, I'll be using it again for sure.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top