Complex waveform/harmonics question

  • Thread starter tommoturbo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Complex
In summary, the ideal voltage amplifier should have a gain of 100, but in practice, the output voltage is given by Vo=vi(98+(2/.001)vi). When a 10mV peak 800Hz sinusoidal input signal is applied, the output voltage is 1.18V. To find the percentage second harmonic distortion present in the output, you need to find the coefficient of vi^2 in the expression, which is 2000.
  • #1
tommoturbo
33
0
Really stuck with this one any help appreciated

Homework Statement


a voltage amplifier ideally should have the relationship Vo=100vi
but in practice is Vo=vi(98+ (2/.001) vi)

determine the expression for the output voltage when a 10mv peak 800hz sinusoidal input signal is applied



Homework Equations



v1=Asin(wt)




The Attempt at a Solution



right i know that the equation needs to have the fundamental and second harmonic in

i have so far

vo=10mv(98+(2/.001)10mv vo=1.18v

vo=0.1+98sin(1600pi t)

iknow at 1600hz 1 cycle will be 1.25ms
and at 3200hz 1 cyle will be 3.125ms

the example in the lesson is in a different format and i can't relate the steps to this example

i don't think I am far off with the expression but can't justify the steps in getting that.

any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
tommoturbo said:
Really stuck with this one any help appreciated

Homework Statement


a voltage amplifier ideally should have the relationship Vo=100vi
but in practice is Vo=vi(98+ (2/.001) vi)

determine the expression for the output voltage when a 10mv peak 800hz sinusoidal input signal is applied

Homework Equations



v1=Asin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



right i know that the equation needs to have the fundamental and second harmonic in

i have so far

vo=10mv(98+(2/.001)10mv vo=1.18v

vo=0.1+98sin(1600pi t)

iknow at 1600hz 1 cycle will be 1.25ms
and at 3200hz 1 cyle will be 3.125ms

the example in the lesson is in a different format and i can't relate the steps to this example

i don't think I am far off with the expression but can't justify the steps in getting that.

any help appreciated

You should not replace vi by 10mV. This is a dc voltage.
vi should be [tex]10x10^{-3}sin(1600\pi t)[/tex]
Notice that the output voltage has a term that depends on vi squared. What is the square of a sinusoid?
 
  • #3
grateful for the reply.

i foujnd this on the net
"From basic trigonometry the square of a sinusoidal input is a DC shifted sinusoid of twice the input frequency"


this is the second harmonic i believe Vi=10mv sin (1600pi t)?
i know i need to have a cos wave something like 1/2cos(3200pi t) ?

but i havnt had enough in th elesson to feel confident of what I am writing. I've done the lesson 3 times now and each time get a little more from it

thanks ian
 
Last edited:
  • #4
tommoturbo said:
grateful for the reply.

i foujnd this on the net
"From basic trigonometry the square of a sinusoidal input is a DC shifted sinusoid of twice the input frequency"


this is the second harmonic i believe Vi=10mv sin (1600pi t)?
i know i need to have a cos wave something like 1/2cos(3200pi t) ?

but i havnt had enough in th elesson to feel confident of what I am writing. I've done the lesson 3 times now and each time get a little more from it

thanks ian
The amplitude of the second harmonic is not 10mV.
Remember your trigonometry lessons. What is the expression for the sine of the double arc?
Remember also that [tex]sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1[/tex].
Subtracting one expression from the other, what do you get?
 
  • #5
Sorry man I am lost, i have just started this open learning course after being out of education for 15 years i have managed to answer th efirst 5 questions of my assignment fine as the lessons had enough examples for me to practice on however the lesson I am on with now only has 1 in a different format to what the question above is asking, so I am sorry if i sound dumb

thanks for trying

ian
 
  • #6
By the rules of the forum, we are not allowed to give you the answers, only to point you to the right direction.
You must do your work and show it. Then we can correct you.
 
  • #7
Yeah i understand that but sadly i don't understand it enough il keep on at it and try again

thanks
 
  • #8
a voltage amplifier ideally should have the relationship Vo=100vi
but in practice is Vo=vi(98+ (2/.001) vi)

determine the expression for the output voltage when a 10mv peak 800hz sinusoidal input signal is applied

I see nothing in the question about second harmonics.
10mV IS the peak amplitude of the input signal.


OK, ideally the amplifier should have a gain of 100. (Vout = 100 * Vin)
So the output should be 10 mV * 100 or 1 volt peak.

But in practice has an output voltage of Vin * (98 + 2000*Vin) = 1.18 volts peak.

And this is exactly what you got.

"peak" is the amplitude of half a sinewave. The ideal gain and the 800 hz are irrelevant to the final answer.
 
  • #9
vk6kro said:
a voltage amplifier ideally should have the relationship Vo=100vi
but in practice is Vo=vi(98+ (2/.001) vi)

determine the expression for the output voltage when a 10mv peak 800hz sinusoidal input signal is applied

I see nothing in the question about second harmonics.
10mV IS the peak amplitude of the input signal.


OK, ideally the amplifier should have a gain of 100. (Vout = 100 * Vin)
So the output should be 10 mV * 100 or 1 volt peak.

But in practice has an output voltage of Vin * (98 + 2000*Vin) = 1.18 volts peak.

And this is exactly what you got.

"peak" is the amplitude of half a sinewave. The ideal gain and the 800 hz are irrelevant to the final answer.

If you perform the multiplication, you get vi squared. The square of a sinusoid corresponds to a dc plus a sinusoid with the double of the frequency of the input.
 
  • #10
hello there right i think I am on to something now my final expression is

Vo=100+980 sin (1600pi t)-100 cos(3200pi t)

100 is the dc term
1600hz is the fundamental
and 3200hz is the second harmonic

it now asks for the percentage second harmonic distortion present in the output

need to check this out and repost my workings

thanks for replies and pointing me in the right direction
 
  • #11
tommoturbo said:
hello there right i think I am on to something now my final expression is

Vo=100+980 sin (1600pi t)-100 cos(3200pi t)

100 is the dc term
1600hz is the fundamental
and 3200hz is the second harmonic

it now asks for the percentage second harmonic distortion present in the output

need to check this out and repost my workings

thanks for replies and pointing me in the right direction

It is still wrong. What is the coefficient of [tex]vi^2[/tex]?
You must use:
[tex]cos^2 x+sin^2 x = 1[/tex]
[tex]cos^2 x-sin^2 x=cos 2x[/tex]
 
  • #12
i need help too I'm getting a second harmonic at 1600hz at an amplitude of 10v as 2/1*10^-3 is 2000, takes me to 20(1/2(1-cos(2*1600pi t)))
 
  • #13
okay I'm getting an answer of dc term 10v, fundamental of 0.98v at 800hz and a secondary of 10v at 1600hz, but that would say my amplifier was Vo=10000Vi why am i getting this answer? please help
 
  • #14
Hi there, I think I've got the answer. Just need it checking!

Vo = 0.1 + 0.98sin(1600 pi t) - 0.1cos (3200 pi t)

Thanks for any reply.
 
  • #15
No the answer comes out as 10+0.98sin(1600pi t)-10cos(3200pi t) as the second part of the equation is 2/k which is 2/1*10^-3 = 2000 multiply that by 10mV or 0.01 gives 20 multiply that by half gives you 10
 
  • #16
drizzt72 said:
Hi there, I think I've got the answer. Just need it checking!

Vo = 0.1 + 0.98sin(1600 pi t) - 0.1cos (3200 pi t)

Thanks for any reply.

You have a sign error. The answer is
0.1 + 0.98 cos (1660 pi t) + 0.1 cos (3200 pi t)

Notice that the amplitudes sum to more than 1. I think that there is an error in the original statement that should be

vo = vi (98 + 2/0.01 vi)
 
  • #17
magik said:
No the answer comes out as 10+0.98sin(1600pi t)-10cos(3200pi t) as the second part of the equation is 2/k which is 2/1*10^-3 = 2000 multiply that by 10mV or 0.01 gives 20 multiply that by half gives you 10

In reality the amplitude of the wave must be squared. 10 mV squared is 0.0001.
 
  • #18
CEL said:
You have a sign error. The answer is
0.1 + 0.98 cos (1660 pi t) + 0.1 cos (3200 pi t)

Notice that the amplitudes sum to more than 1. I think that there is an error in the original statement that should be

vo = vi (98 + 2/0.01 vi)

I have the answer now it's 10 + 0.98 sin (1600 pi t) + 10 cos(3200 pi t) as we're working in millivolts the dc term is 10 mV, the fundamental is 0.98v at 800hz and the second harmonic is 10mV at 1600hz I've had this checked and it is correct
 
  • #19
magik said:
I have the answer now it's 10 + 0.98 sin (1600 pi t) + 10 cos(3200 pi t) as we're working in millivolts the dc term is 10 mV, the fundamental is 0.98v at 800hz and the second harmonic is 10mV at 1600hz I've had this checked and it is correct

If you are working in millivolts, the amplitude of the fundamental sinusoid should be 98 and not 0.98.
 
  • #20
CEL said:
If you are working in millivolts, the amplitude of the fundamental sinusoid should be 98 and not 0.98.

Yes it is but in the equation the fundamental is worked out in volts whereas the second harmonic and dc term are multiplied by 2/0.001 to change it to work out in millivolts
 
  • #21
Hi Cel

Thanks for your reply.

I've been looking at this question for a few days now and I still get a negative sign at latter end of the expression. Here's how I've got there.

Question

A voltage amplifier ideally shouldm have the input-output realationship of v(0) = 100 v(i) but relationship in practice is :

v(0) = v(i) (98 + 2/k v(i) )

(a) Determine the expression for the output voltage when a 10 mV (peak), 800 Hz sinusoidal signal is applied to the amplifier.

ANSWER

v (i) = 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t)

Substitute into original practical expression:

v (0) = 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t) x (98 + 2/0.001 * 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t) )

= 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t) x (98 +2000 * 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t) )

= 0.01 sin (1600 pi *t) x (98 + 20 sin (1600 pi *t) )

= 0.98 sin (1600 pi *t) + 0.2 sin^2 (1600 pi*t)

Using trig identity sin ^2(x) = 1/2 (1 - cos 2x):

= 0.98 sin (1600 pi *t) + 0.2 [ 1/2 (1 - cos 2 * 1600 pi *t)]

= 0.98 sin (1600 pi *t) + 0.1 - 0.1 cos(3200 pi*t)

= 0.1 + 0.98 sin (1600 pi *t) - 0.1 cos(3200 pi*t)

Thanks in advance for any reply.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
You are right. I have made the calculations with the cosine (that is the usual waveform) and found a plus sign.
With a sine waveform you get a minus sign,
 
  • #23
Thanks again CEL,

I thought i was losing it.
 

1. What is a complex waveform?

A complex waveform is a type of electrical signal that consists of multiple sine waves with different frequencies, amplitudes, and phases. It is a combination of simple waveforms that results in a more complex waveform pattern.

2. How do harmonics affect complex waveforms?

Harmonics are multiples of the fundamental frequency in a complex waveform. They can affect the shape, amplitude, and phase of the waveform, resulting in a more complex and distorted signal. Higher order harmonics can also introduce noise into the signal.

3. What is the importance of complex waveform analysis?

Complex waveform analysis is crucial for understanding and characterizing signals in various fields, such as physics, engineering, and medicine. It allows us to identify the individual components of a complex waveform and how they contribute to the overall signal.

4. How can complex waveforms be generated?

Complex waveforms can be generated through various methods, such as modulation, filtering, and synthesizing. They can also occur naturally in signals from electronic devices, musical instruments, or biological systems.

5. How can complex waveforms be analyzed?

Complex waveforms can be analyzed using mathematical techniques such as Fourier analysis, which breaks down the signal into its component frequencies. Signal processing tools, such as oscilloscopes and spectrum analyzers, can also be used to visualize and analyze complex waveforms.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top