Programs Complicated Matters in Choosing a Major

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spherical Cow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biotechnology Major
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision-making process regarding choosing a major, specifically between bioengineering and mechanical engineering, with a strong interest in physics. The individual initially majored in bioengineering but switched to mechanical engineering due to the newer status of the bioengineering program and a desire for a broader engineering foundation. However, they find physics more intellectually stimulating and are considering switching back to bioengineering to allow for a minor in physics, which they believe would enhance personal fulfillment.The conversation highlights the perceived value of a mechanical engineering degree with a focus on bioengineering, suggesting it may provide a more relevant skill set for future engineering goals. The individual expresses a desire to understand the overlap between physics and bioengineering, particularly in areas like statistical mechanics and how physics could offer tools that mechanical engineering may not provide, especially in the biotechnology field. The overarching theme emphasizes the importance of pursuing interests while balancing practical career considerations.
Spherical Cow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Choosing a Major

I'm a sophomore undergrad at Stanford that is interested in biotechnology. I was majoring in bioengineering, but recently switched to mechanical engineering. Main reasons were because the bioengineering program here is too new and I'd rather have a broader engineering background for undergrad.

I also really enjoy physics. But if I continue with mechanical engineering, I won't have space to take any physics electives. So I'm contemplating switching back to bioengineering, which will give me room to minor in physics. This would be mostly for personal fulfillment.

To be honest, I find physics far more intellectually engaging than mechanical engineering. The only thing holding me back is knowing that a degree in mechanical engineering with a bioengineering focus is more useful and valuable than a degree in bioengineering with a physics minor. What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Study what will be interesting to you. If more people on this board took that very simple advice, most of the "what should I major in... xxxx seems more hireable but I really like yyyy" posts would go away.
 
Don't get me wrong, I think mechanical engineering is very interesting. By 'more useful and valuable', I didn't mean 'more hireable'. I meant that it is more relevant toward my goals and will ultimately make me the better engineer. With mechanical engineering, I would have a better toolbox to use with my bioengineering interests.

Physics is more of a personal interest seems less applicable toward my studies. The main reason why I want to pursue it is because it offers a deeper mathematical understanding than most engineering classes, which have more of a 'plug and chug' approach.

I should be more specific about what I'm asking. I'm interested in knowing in what areas do physics and bioengineering overlap. For example, statistical mechanics treatment of biological systems. What other kinds of tools will studying physics give me that mechanical engineering won't? In what ways would studying physics be advantageous to mechanical engineering in the field of biotechnology?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top