Components of Velocity (Collisions)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a collision problem involving two spheres with different masses and velocities. The participant applied the conservation of momentum to determine the speed of sphere B after the collision, arriving at the correct answer of √2 m/s. However, confusion arises regarding the behavior of velocity components perpendicular to the line of centers during the collision, as the vertical component of sphere A's velocity changes from -2j to -3j. Clarification is sought on why this change occurs, despite the principle stating that such components should remain unchanged. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the plane of collision and its relation to the velocity components involved.
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



I solved this problem simply by substituting the initial and final velocities in vector form and applying the principle of conservation of momentum, but there's something I don't understand about this problem.

"Two small smooth spheres A and B have equal radii. The mass of A is 2m kg and the mass of B is m kg. The spheres are moving on a smooth horizontal plane and they collide. Immediately before the collision the velocity of A is (2i – 2j) ms-1 and the velocity of B is (–3ij) ms-1. Immediately after the collision the velocity of A is (i – 3j) ms-1. Find the speed of B immediately after the collision."

I thought that the components of velocity perpendicular to the line of centres of the spheres would be unchanged in the collision, at least, this is what it says in my M4 book. The vertical component of A's velocity before is -2j, but after colliding with B, it's vertical component is -3j. Why is this?

Thanks.


Homework Equations



v = eu, conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



If you simply apply the conversation of momentum principle with the velocities in vector form, you get the correct answer of √2 m/s. But why do the velocities perpendicular to the line of centres change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FeDeX_LaTeX said:

Homework Statement



I solved this problem simply by substituting the initial and final velocities in vector form and applying the principle of conservation of momentum, but there's something I don't understand about this problem.

"Two small smooth spheres A and B have equal radii. The mass of A is 2m kg and the mass of B is m kg. The spheres are moving on a smooth horizontal plane and they collide. Immediately before the collision the velocity of A is (2i – 2j) ms-1 and the velocity of B is (–3ij) ms-1. Immediately after the collision the velocity of A is (i – 3j) ms-1. Find the speed of B immediately after the collision."

I thought that the components of velocity perpendicular to the line of centres of the spheres would be unchanged in the collision, at least, this is what it says in my M4 book. The vertical component of A's velocity before is -2j, but after colliding with B, it's vertical component is -3j. Why is this?

Thanks.

Homework Equations



v = eu, conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



If you simply apply the conversation of momentum principle with the velocities in vector form, you get the correct answer of √2 m/s. But why do the velocities perpendicular to the line of centres change?

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "velocities perpendicular to the line of centres", but the velocity components in the plane of collision remain will remain unchanged.
 
jegues said:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "velocities perpendicular to the line of centres", but the velocity components in the plane of collision remain will remain unchanged.

I just mean this: ---OO---

But plane of collision is the same thing to 'perpendicular to the line of centres'.

So how come in the question this doesn't apply? Is this an error?
 
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
I just mean this: ---OO---

But plane of collision is the same thing to 'perpendicular to the line of centres'.

So how come in the question this doesn't apply? Is this an error?

To me the plane of collision is the plane at which the two spheres make contact.

The only way I explain how to visualize this would be to imagine two spheres touching each other side by side and at the point where they actually touch place a infinitesimally thin piece of paper in between them.

This upright piece of paper is the plane in which the collision takes place (i.e. where the two spheres make contact).

Since your spheres are rolling around in the xy plane (for simplicity let's assume we are in the plane z = 0) the plane of the collision is going to be perpendicular to the xy plane.

In other words, the plane will stretch out in the positive and negative z direction forever.

Clearly any vectors that were to lie in this plane would cause the spheres to move in either the positive or negative z direction. (They would have to point in one of the two directions)

\text{i.e., } \quad \hat{k} \quad \text{ or } \quad -\hat{k}

Clearly that is not the case, correct? So I still believe the statement holds in your case.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top