Composite Bar Length Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter eduardalcazar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the length of each composite bar made from two different metals that expand differently when heated. The formula for thermal expansion, deltaL = initial L x coefficient of thermal expansion x CHANGE IN TEMPERATURE, is highlighted as essential for solving the problem. Participants emphasize the importance of finding the coefficients of thermal expansion for both metals based on the given expansion values. One user mentions arriving at an answer of 20 but seeks justification for this result. The forum encourages sharing calculations for further clarification and learning.
eduardalcazar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



metal rod 30cm long expands by 0.075cm when its temp. is raised from 0C to 100C. A rod of diff. metal of the same length expands by 0.045cm for the same rise in temp. A third rod, also 30cm long is made up of pices of each of the above metals placed end-to-end expands 0.065cm between 0C to 100C.

What is the length of EACH composite bar.



The Attempt at a Solution



deltaL=initial L x coefficient of thermal expansion.

That formula was the similar from some of my friends. I tried it but still i found it out complicated. Thanks in advance to those who helped. God bless
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The coefficient of thermal expansion is what fraction of it's original length a material expands for each 1deg change in temperature.
You can find this value for materials A and B from the numbers you are given.

Your equation isn't quiet correct, it should be: deltaL=initial L x coefficient of thermal expansion x CHANGE IN TEMPERATURE
 
please state your help in equation with explanations. I was able to find the answer but not sure. in my computation the answer 20. I just need a justification in this answer.

Thanks..
 
This site is to teach people how to answer science questions and help them when they go wrong - we don't just supply answers.
I suggest you post your calculations of the coeff for the two materials.
Then we will explain how to do part 2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top