- #1
MThornton
- 28
- 0
I am the head electrician at Panorama, a ski-resort in SE BC. It is my job to identify & take action on energy improvement measures… This usually doesn’t involve consulting physicists, but now I have something beyond my experience.
Our snow-making plant uses 3 x 800 HP centrifugal air-compressors to feed the mountain the compressed air we use to make snow. The system was originally designed in the mid 1980s, and the air-system has an aftercooler located immediately next to the compressor building. From there is approx total 12 miles of piping that runs up the mountain to an high-point elevation approx 3500’ above the compressor building. The old aftercooler is an air-air type, where the discharge air runs through a cooling tower with a double-walled pipe. The inside pipe contains the moisture laden discharge air, and the outside pipe is simply a conduit for blowing the ambient outside air (typically -10 to -25 DegC). Moisture that condenses inside the discharge air inner pipe, runs down to a header with a drain. The maximum discharge rate is 10,000 cfm at 130 psi.
The commercial compressed-air aftercoolers of this scale that are presently on the market are both expensive & energy hungry.
Here is an overall general primer on snowmaking systems
http://peakstoprairies.org/p2bande/skigreen/Ch%2011%20Snowmaking.pdf"
Moisture in the discharge air is bad for a number of reasons.
- Water vapour inhibits the super-cooling effect of the air at the snow-gun nozzle as it emerges & expands. The super-cooling effect is very desirable for snow-making.
- Water vapour condenses in significant quantities inside the 12 miles of underground mountain piping, and gives us operational problems
- Pushing the unwanted water vapour up the mountain pipe-plant obviously is consuming energy, and is considered a loss.
Colder discharge air is better because of the higher density, it takes less of it (by volume) to achieve the same atomizing effect at the snow-gun nozzles
I want to make a significant improvement in the operation of our existing aftercooler, which shouldn’t be too hard, since the existing air-air system is very ineffective. My plan is to simply remove the blower from the outside air jacket (a sealed pipe, sch. 40), and convert to a circulating chilling-water outer jacket. I have a big cold creek right next to the plant (also a pumphouse), so lots of very cold water (+1 DegC) is available. The drained off chilling water (now warmer) will simply be discharged back to the creek.
Questions :
1) What ratio of aftercooler performance improvement can I expect by changing from a air-air heat exchanger, to an air-water heat exchanger. Or, what method would I best use to approach the problem?
2) By removing additional water vapour, I can now use my 2400 HP of compressor power to push more air (now dryer) up the mountain. How can I calculate “how much more”?
3) The cooler air will be more dense & effective at generating water atomization at the snow-gun nozzles. How can I estimate how much?
This job has the prospect of significant energy efficiency gains (perhaps 100-300 MWh annually). I need to answer the above questions before I can approach Sr. management. Only then can I hire an engineer for the job. At that point I’ll begin looking for a good air engineer (that isn’t a salesman)
MThornton
"www.panoramaresort.com"[/URL]
Our snow-making plant uses 3 x 800 HP centrifugal air-compressors to feed the mountain the compressed air we use to make snow. The system was originally designed in the mid 1980s, and the air-system has an aftercooler located immediately next to the compressor building. From there is approx total 12 miles of piping that runs up the mountain to an high-point elevation approx 3500’ above the compressor building. The old aftercooler is an air-air type, where the discharge air runs through a cooling tower with a double-walled pipe. The inside pipe contains the moisture laden discharge air, and the outside pipe is simply a conduit for blowing the ambient outside air (typically -10 to -25 DegC). Moisture that condenses inside the discharge air inner pipe, runs down to a header with a drain. The maximum discharge rate is 10,000 cfm at 130 psi.
The commercial compressed-air aftercoolers of this scale that are presently on the market are both expensive & energy hungry.
Here is an overall general primer on snowmaking systems
http://peakstoprairies.org/p2bande/skigreen/Ch%2011%20Snowmaking.pdf"
Moisture in the discharge air is bad for a number of reasons.
- Water vapour inhibits the super-cooling effect of the air at the snow-gun nozzle as it emerges & expands. The super-cooling effect is very desirable for snow-making.
- Water vapour condenses in significant quantities inside the 12 miles of underground mountain piping, and gives us operational problems
- Pushing the unwanted water vapour up the mountain pipe-plant obviously is consuming energy, and is considered a loss.
Colder discharge air is better because of the higher density, it takes less of it (by volume) to achieve the same atomizing effect at the snow-gun nozzles
I want to make a significant improvement in the operation of our existing aftercooler, which shouldn’t be too hard, since the existing air-air system is very ineffective. My plan is to simply remove the blower from the outside air jacket (a sealed pipe, sch. 40), and convert to a circulating chilling-water outer jacket. I have a big cold creek right next to the plant (also a pumphouse), so lots of very cold water (+1 DegC) is available. The drained off chilling water (now warmer) will simply be discharged back to the creek.
Questions :
1) What ratio of aftercooler performance improvement can I expect by changing from a air-air heat exchanger, to an air-water heat exchanger. Or, what method would I best use to approach the problem?
2) By removing additional water vapour, I can now use my 2400 HP of compressor power to push more air (now dryer) up the mountain. How can I calculate “how much more”?
3) The cooler air will be more dense & effective at generating water atomization at the snow-gun nozzles. How can I estimate how much?
This job has the prospect of significant energy efficiency gains (perhaps 100-300 MWh annually). I need to answer the above questions before I can approach Sr. management. Only then can I hire an engineer for the job. At that point I’ll begin looking for a good air engineer (that isn’t a salesman)
MThornton
"www.panoramaresort.com"[/URL]
Last edited by a moderator: