Compressing Water: Can It Be Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Falgata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compressed Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the feasibility of compressing water by first converting it to gas, compressing that gas, and then allowing it to condense back into liquid form. Participants clarify that while water itself cannot be compressed, the gas phase can be compressed, but this process will not yield a liquid state without specific conditions. The boiling point of water varies with pressure, meaning that excessive compression can lead to liquid or solid states rather than a compressed liquid. Additionally, water vapor requires cooling or compression to transition back to liquid, and this process involves energy dynamics. Ultimately, the concept remains theoretical and requires precise conditions to achieve the desired outcome.
Falgata
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Okey I know that this title is somewhat misleading.

Here we go

Me and a friend started to discuss what would happen if someone took one unit of water and turn it into a gas and then rapidly compressed the gas before then cooling it down to room temperature.

I know that one can not compress water, but by doing this would it be possible to compress the gases and then allow it at a time off ones own choising uncompress the gas and let it go into a liquid state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Falgata said:
Me and a friend started to discuss what would happen if someone took one unit of water and turn it into a gas and then rapidly compressed the gas before then cooling it down to room temperature.

I know that one can not compress water, but by doing this would it be possible to compress the gases and then allow it at a time off ones own choising uncompress the gas and let it go into a liquid state.
If I understand correctly what you mean, you are wondering if you can transform liquid water into a gas, compress the gas into a volume less than that of the liquid water, and then let the gas condense into a liquid again, effectively resulting in a compressed liquid? Short answer: no! The boiling point varies with pressure. If you try to compress the gas too much (at constant temperature), it will transform into a liquid (or even into a solid, depending on the conditions).
 
Falgata said:
Okey I know that this title is somewhat misleading.

Here we go

Me and a friend started to discuss what would happen if someone took one unit of water and turn it into a gas and then rapidly compressed the gas before then cooling it down to room temperature.

I know that one can not compress water, but by doing this would it be possible to compress the gases and then allow it at a time off ones own choising uncompress the gas and let it go into a liquid state.

Your argument is not clear, but I think I follow it up to the last part of the last sentence. There, you lose me completely. Water vapor will not "go into a liquid state" on its own. It must be either cooled or compressed or both. At room temperature, liquid water will naturally vaporize unless the ambient vapor pressure is at the equilibrium pressure or higher. This vaporization requires energy. If no energy is provided (heating), then the water will draw the enthalpy of vaporization from its surroundings.

I'm not sure what end you have in mind. Or, is this a thought problem? If so, it needs restating.
 
You can compress water. The shock hugoniot is well known for water.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top