Computational fluid dynamics: steady 2D flow

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding velocity components in a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problem involving steady 2D flow. The user initially analyzes the velocity changes in both the X and Y directions based on given values, concluding the direction of velocities. Confusion arises regarding the solution's assertion that higher values lead to specific directional conclusions, which seems counterintuitive. Clarification is provided through the use of mathematical relationships, specifically the derivatives of the stream function, which help make sense of the velocity components. Ultimately, the user finds the mathematical approach more logical and helpful for solving the problem.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6
1. Homework Statement
cfd.png


Homework Equations


CFD

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm a bit confused by this question.

So at first what I do for the problem on the left, I find the changes in the velocities in X and and Y on all four sides.

I notice that the values on the diagram to the left are higher on top than they are on the bottom, therefore I conclude that v must be "up".
I also notice that the values are higher on the right than they are on the left, therefore I conclude that u is to the right.

For the diagram on the right: I notice that bottom > top, therefore v is down.
Right > left, therefore u is to the right.Are these assumptions correct?

After that it's a fairly simple problem but this first step has me confused as to what I'm supposed to be doing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what they want you to do is to find the y velocity components at the centers of the horizontal faces, and the x velocity components at the centers of the vertical faces, and then average to get the velocity components at the center of the cell.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Feodalherren
I don't understand. The solution says "Ψtop>Ψbottom, therefore U is to the right" and "Ψright>Ψleft therefore V is down".
This is completely counter intuitive and seems to be taken out of the thin air. What are they basing this on?
 
Feodalherren said:
I don't understand. The solution says "Ψtop>Ψbottom, therefore U is to the right" and "Ψright>Ψleft therefore V is down".
This is completely counter intuitive and seems to be taken out of the thin air. What are they basing this on?
$$v_x=\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}$$
$$v_y=-\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Feodalherren
That makes a million times more sense. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K