Computational Path Integration

Trajito
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello to all,

To take Feynman path integrals, which Monte Carlo algorithm do you think is best to use? I tried VEGAS algorithm as it is in GNU Scientific Library. It is pretty useful for many kinds of multi-dimensional integrals but since the path integral formulation includes Gaussian integrals, it gives really huge errors (I don't know why it isn't suitable for the Gaussians). So, do you think Metropolis works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer was "yes." When calculating every kind of very high dimensional integrals, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are widely employed. Two most common of these are Gibbs sampling and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Both have advantages; the latter is, as far as I see, much more complicated and much more advanced.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top