Compute Limit of 4-Vectors: p and q

  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation Limit
parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
I've the following problem. I have two four-vectors p and q where p is timelike (p^{2} > 0) and q is spacelike(q^{2} < 0).
Now I should consider the quantity

- \dfrac{2 (pq)^{2} + p^{2} q^{2}}{q^{2}}

and compute the limit q \to 0.

But I don't know how to perform the limit procedure. Could anyone help me please?

I already tried to consider the problem in a special frame with p=(p^{0}, \vec{0}) but it doesn't help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show some more detail of the work you did?
 
My attempt so far was not successfully. I considered a special frame where p = \left( p^{0}, \vec{0} \right) which is possible, because p is timelike. Furthermore I defined q = (0, \epsilon, \epsilon, \epsilon). This will lead to:

- \dfrac{2 (pq)^{2} + p^{2} q^{2}}{q^{2}} = - p_{0}^{2}

and for arbitrary p we should have: - p^{2}.

But somehow I don't think that I can specify q in this way. Another choice of q, e.g. q = (\epsilon, \epsilon, \epsilon, \epsilon) would lead to a vanishing contribution = 0, so I don't know how to compute the considered quantity. Obviously it depends on the choice of q.

Any idea how to do that?
 
I've one further information, but I don't know if it helps: (p-q) \in V^{+}.

So, I also tried to consider a special frame where
p-q = (p^{0} - q^{0}, \vec{0}).

Which leads to \vec{p} = \vec{q} and therefore:

- \dfrac{2 (pq)^{2} + p^{2} q^{2}}{q^{2}} = - \dfrac{2 (p^{0} q^{0} - \vec{p} \, ^{2})^{2} + p^{2} (q_{0}^{2} - \vec{p} \, ^{2})}{q_{0} - \vec{p} \, ^{2}} \simeq 2 \vec{p} \, ^{2} - p^{2}

Then I rewrite the last \vec{p} \, ^{2} into \vec{p} \cdot \vec{q} and finally obtain (again): -p^{2}.

But it appears questionable to do the computation like this.

Could anyone help me please?
 
Pephaps the identity (p+q)2 = p2 + q2 +2pq might be of help.
 
... it does not really help
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top