Computeing the coordinate vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter savageqm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate Vector
savageqm
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
hello, am confuse with this problem.

I have

B = {U1,U2} and B' = {u'1,u'2}

u1 = [2,2], u2 =[4,-1] u'1 = [1,3], u'2 = [1,1]

Now I have found the transition matrix from B' to B which is

13/10 -1/2

-2/5 0

Now, the question that am having trouble with is: Compute the coordinate vector [w]B where

w = [3,-5]

What I did was.

[ 13/10 -1/2

-2/5 0 ] * [3,-5] = [32/5, -6/5]but, this answer is wrong according to my book. Please help explain what they are asking for. I figure they were asking for : [v]b = Pb' -> b[v]b'

the book answer is [w]B = [-17/10, 8/5]

opps I spelled computing wrong, sorry.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
w is not written in the basis B' but in the standard basis (1, 0) and (0, 1). Your book gives the correct answer.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
952
Back
Top