Chemistry Concentration of Phosphorus from KH2PHO4

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxisCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the concentration of phosphorus from a KH2PO4 solution and the challenges faced in measuring phosphorus in soil using a test kit. The initial calculation of a 0.5% solution was corrected to account for the mass of the solution, leading to a more accurate concentration. Concerns were raised about the reliability of soil test kits, which can vary in accuracy due to their colorimetric methods. The user attempted to create calibration solutions but faced issues with low transmittance readings, suggesting the need for dilution or shorter cuvettes. The conversation concludes with the potential to improve understanding of the test kit's performance using insights from MSDS documents related to the extractant used.
AxisCat
Messages
42
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
none
Relevant Equations
none
Hi All,

I am not sure if I am doing my math correctly. I am sure my method is jacked up but here is what I did:

I mixed .5g of KH2PHO4 powder with 100 ml distilled water. From my poor understanding of chemistry I thought I would end up with a .5% solution or 5000 ppm.

I then tried to calculate the percent of Phosphorus in this solution using the fact that 22.76% by mass of the KH2PHO4 is K. Multiplying that out would give me .114% of actual K in the solution.

Like I say, my chemistry skills are poor so I am probably doing this all wrong. Can somebody help get me going in the right direction?

Thanks,
Axis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK.

The only thing that is a bit incorrect is the fact that if you dissolved 0.5 g in 100 g of water (good approximation for 100 mL) percent concentration of the salt was not 0.5%, but 0.5/100.5*100% (mass of the salt over mass of the solution which is 100g+0.5 g). For such a diluted solution and typical accuracy of the lab work the difference is completely negligible.
 
Thanks for the equation, I knew it was going to be a lil off but it is nice to know the proper way to calculate it.

What I am attempting to do is measure the amount of Phosphorus from a sample of soil. This is where things get a bit sketchy. I purchased a soil test kit for NPK. From researching these kits it seems like there can be a lot of error in them. From decent to completely useless. Basically it uses an extractant to pull the nutrient from the soil then a reagent to develop a color that you match by eye to chart.

My main assumption is that the developed color follows Beer-Lambert law. I tried preparing a set of calibration solutions using 0, 63, 114, and 190 ppm concentrations using the extractant and reagent from the kit.

It did give me a pretty blue color:

color.png


But the transmittance through the samples is way too low. I used a 10mm cuvette and a monochromator (scanned from 800-900 nm) to measure. I used a couple of different photodiodes set to the highest gain/integration time and couldn't get a reading.

I know at this point you probably can't help me much more. I was just hoping I could improve on the results of this test kit with my gear.

Appreciate you taking the time to look this.
 
Nothing unusual, there is only a limited range of concentrations for which the measurement will work reasonably good (once the concentration gets too high the dependence is no longer linear). Try either more diluted samples or shorter cuvette. The former is rather simple, especially if the pipette you use is adjustable.

But as you already mentioned - such simple tests require tons of disclaimers that limit their usefulness. They are better than nothing, but highly approximate.
 
So I lucked up on the MSDS documents for this test kit. The phosphorus extractant:
msds.png


This looks very similar to the chemicals used with the Murphy-Riley method which is a well documented method to test for phosphorus:

test.png



Maybe I can use this new information to better understand exactly how this kit performs the test and decide if it warrants more work on my part.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top