Concentrations at equilibrium (strong base weak acid)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding equilibrium concentrations in acid-base reactions, specifically relating to acetic acid. The method presented resembles the I.C.E (Initial, Change, Equilibrium) method, where initial concentrations are calculated before the reaction begins. The key point is that the equilibrium concentrations do not need to sum to the initial concentration due to the nature of chemical reactions. In the example provided, acetic acid reacts to produce ethanoate ions and hydronium ions, leading to a situation where the total concentration can exceed the initial amount because of the reaction's stoichiometry. It is emphasized that while the number of moles or concentrations may change, mass is conserved throughout the reaction. The clarification helps resolve the conceptual misunderstanding about the relationship between reactants and products in equilibrium calculations.
Mr-Thirty
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Why do my concentrations at equilibrium not add up to my initial amount?
So my professor covered acids and bases recently, and this is how he presented the method (please see attached word document). I believe its the same as the I.C.E method, though I am not sure. Anyways my problem is perhaps conceptual, but I don't understand why the concentrations at equilibrium don't add up to the amount added in the first place. The first step is to calculate the initial concentrations for the acetic acid at equilibrium by finding alpha. Once you have alpha you can plug it into the table to find the concentrations. I thought id check that the concentrations at equilibrium added up to 0.1M but they add up to more. Where am I going wrong here?
 

Attachments

Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think I understand what might be confusing you but if otherwise please let me know.

With your first ICE table, you have c0 of acetic acid before the reversible reaction begins. Now your reaction equation tells you that 1 mole of acetic acid reacts with 1 mole of water to produce 1 mole of ethanoate ions and 1 mole of hydronium ions. The volume is constant so it is fine to use concentrations from now on.

If the proportion of acetic acid which reacts is \alpha, then as is stated your equilibrium concentration of acetic acid is (1-\alpha)c_{0}, since \alpha c_{0} of acetic acid has reacted. Now according to the equation, \alpha c_{0} of acetic acid reacts to produce \alpha c_{0} of ethanoate and \alpha c_{0} of hydronium.

You are entirely correct that the final concentrations do not add up to the initial concentration; this is perfectly fine - consider the following reaction:

A \rightarrow B + C

The equation tells us the ratio of moles: 1 mole of A reacts to produce 1 mole of B and 1 mole of C. If we start with 10 moles of A, we will end up with 10 moles of B and 10 of C - which adds up to 20 moles!

The important point is that in a chemical reaction, it is not the number of moles (and by extension concentration) which is conserved, since molecules can split up and do all sorts of stuff (perhaps imagine a decomposition reaction where a molecule might split into two equal fragments, we'll end up with twice as many molecules at the end). What is conserved in a chemical reaction is mass.

If you calculate the total mass at the start and end using the M_{r} of each compound then hopefully the mass will have been conserved (!).
 
  • Like
Likes nofluxgiven and Mr-Thirty
Thank you so much, I knew there was a concept that I didnt quite understand. Really appreciate you typing out a thorough response :)
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top