Concentric coils for power generation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using concentric coils for power generation within a magnetic field. Participants explore whether multiple coils, each larger than the previous one, could enhance power generation compared to traditional single-coil designs. The conversation touches on concepts of energy conservation, efficiency, and the interaction of magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that using multiple concentric coils could potentially generate more power, questioning the limitations of current designs.
  • Others argue that conservation of energy limits the effectiveness of adding more coils, as many generators already operate at 98-99% efficiency, leaving little room for improvement.
  • A participant explains that the back-flux generated by an inner coil reduces the available magnetic flux for an outer coil, suggesting that this interaction may negate any potential benefits of using multiple coils.
  • One analogy presented compares the situation to adding a smaller funnel inside a larger one, implying that it does not increase the overall output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of concentric coils for power generation. While some are open to the idea, others firmly believe that conservation of energy and existing efficiency levels present significant barriers, indicating a lack of consensus on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights assumptions regarding energy conservation and efficiency, as well as the dependence on the interaction of magnetic fields between coils. The implications of these factors remain unresolved.

samstergurl
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Can nested coils be used for generation power from a magnetic field?
Most generators work by rotating a coil within a magnetic field. This induces a current in the coil and can be harnessed as electricity. I was wondering if it would be possible to generate more power by using more than one coil with each one being progressively larger wrapped around the others. I also know that the current induced in the coil creates a magnetic field that tries to oppose the change in the fields around it.

Does this prevent something like this from working or being useful? Or is there some other reason that this isn't done?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Nope. Conservation of energy is the dominant effect here. Many electric generators are already 98-99% efficient. The 1-2% losses are due to heating, friction and windage. And >100% efficiency is truly impossible. So there's not much room for improvement, no matter what you do on the electrical side.

It is so much easier evaluating ideas in terms of conservation of energy rather than thinking about amps, and volts, and flux density.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jrmichler, BvU and DaveE
samstergurl said:
Summary:: Can nested coils be used for generation power from a magnetic field?

I was wondering if it would be possible to generate more power by using more than one coil with each one being progressively larger wrapped around the others.
In addition to the overall energy considerations mentioned by @anorlunda the current induced in the inner coil generates a back-flux that lowers the available flux for the outer coil. If the two coils share the same radius, it's just like using a longer coil if you series connect them, or if you parallel connect the two coils you still get the same energy out but just at a different source impedance.

One way to see the flux-stealing effect is if you put a shorted turn around the same area as your pickup coil. The shorted turn kills almost all of the flux from the source, so your pickup coil picks up almost no energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda and DaveE
anorlunda said:
:welcome:

Nope. Conservation of energy is the dominant effect here. Many electric generators are already 98-99% efficient. The 1-2% losses are due to heating, friction and windage. And >100% efficiency is truly impossible. So there's not much room for improvement, no matter what you do on the electrical side.

It is so much easier evaluating ideas in terms of conservation of energy rather than thinking about amps, and volts, and flux density.
So you're already getting 99% of the energy out of that flux area, adding another coil inside of it doesn't improve that. Like how adding a smaller funnel inside of a bigger one doesn't increase the amount of water you get out in the end?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K