Concept of heating gas on pressure.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of heating gas in a rigid, non-expandable container and its effects on pressure. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, molecular collisions, force, and pressure, delving into both theoretical and conceptual aspects of gas behavior under heating conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how heating a gas increases pressure, questioning the role of acceleration and the relationship between force and frequency of molecular collisions.
  • Another participant suggests that molecules gain speed upon heating, leading to increased momentum during collisions, which contributes to higher pressure, noting that pressure grows with the square of speed.
  • A third participant clarifies that acceleration involves changes in velocity, emphasizing the directional component of velocity and its relation to acceleration.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of impulse, stating that each molecule applies an impulse to the wall during collisions, and relate this to the frequency of impacts and pressure, though there is some disagreement on the relevance of the timing of impacts.
  • One participant critiques the explanation provided by another, arguing that the definition of impulse should focus on the duration of the impact rather than the interval between impacts.
  • There is a discussion about the significance of the area under the curve in relation to force and pressure, suggesting that different assumptions about force and duration can yield similar pressure outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between force, frequency of collisions, and pressure. There is no consensus on the best way to conceptualize these relationships, and some points remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the definitions of impulse, force, and pressure, as well as the implications of molecular behavior in a heated gas. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and clarifications regarding these concepts.

chewchun
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused.

Lets say i have a rigid,non-expandable container.

If i heat the container,the gas molecules gain Kinetic energy.
I initially learned that the gas molecules will hit the wall with a larger force,hence larger pressure.But F=MA,so the gas molecules are accelerating?But what if they are not accelerating(high temperature,but not increasing temperature)?

I later learned that it is the increase in number of frequent effective collision per unit time with the wall.But Pressure=Force/Area. So there is a relationship between force and frequency??
 
Science news on Phys.org
A molecule is accelerated every time it bounces off a wall. The greater its speed the greater that acceleration. Best to think of it in terms of momentum. Each bounce (on average) gives an impact proportional to the speed. As you say, the rate of impacts also increases with speed, so the pressure grows as the square of the speed. This is consistent with the fact that the kinetic energy per molecule grows with square of speed, and the temperature is a measure of the energy per (state per) molecule.
 
chewchun..

Acceleration is defined as a change of velocity. Velocity, unlike speed, has a directional components... So changing direction = changing velocity = acceleration.
 
chewchun said:
I later learned that it is the increase in number of frequent effective collision per unit time with the wall.But Pressure=Force/Area. So there is a relationship between force and frequency??

Clearly. A rapid fire machine gun is more destructive than a single shot rifle. More bullets per second on target.

Each particle applies an impulse to the wall as it bounces off. An impulse is defined as the force multiplied by the time over which it occurs. In the case of molecules bouncing off the wall of a box the "time over which it occurs" is the interval between impacts.

Perhaps see
http://zonalandeducation.com/mstm/p...um/introductoryProblems/momentumSummary2.html
 
CWatters said:
Each particle applies an impulse to the wall as it bounces off. An impulse is defined as the force multiplied by the time over which it occurs. In the case of molecules bouncing off the wall of a box the "time over which it occurs" is the interval between impacts.

I think I see where you were going with this, but to me it reads misleadingly.

Each particle applies an impulse to the wall as it bounces off. Impulse is defined as the force multiplied by the time over which it occurs. The "time over which it occurs" for the impulse delivered by a particular molecule is the duration of the impact of that molecule with the wall, not the interval until the next impact. That figure is, of course, not very relevant.

pressure = force / area

force = momentum-delivered / time-taken-to-deliver-it

momentum-delivered = momentum-delivered-per-impact
* impacts-per-unit-time-per-unit-area
* time-taken-to-deliver-it
* area

Accordingly...

pressure = impacts-per-unit-time-per-unit-area * momentum-delivered-per-impact
 
jbriggs444 said:
I think I see where you were going with this, but to me it reads misleadingly.

Each particle applies an impulse to the wall as it bounces off. Impulse is defined as the force multiplied by the time over which it occurs. The "time over which it occurs" for the impulse delivered by a particular molecule is the duration of the impact of that molecule with the wall, not the interval until the next impact.

Ah well yes ok but it makes no difference if you assume a high force/short duration or a low force/long duration impact. What matters is the area under the curve if you get what I mean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
9K