Conceptual Difficulty with Lagrange's Eqn

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the application of Lagrange's equation to kinetic energy in spherical polar coordinates. The user initially believes that the derived expression represents the angular acceleration component, but later realizes it does not match the expected units for acceleration. They acknowledge that dividing the expression by the appropriate metric tensor component is necessary to obtain the correct form of acceleration. Acknowledgment of a mistake in their understanding leads to clarity about the derivation process. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics equations.
H_man
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
I shall give a short example to illustrate where I am confused.

If we take the K.E. of a particle in spherical polar coords.

<br /> T = \frac{1}{2}m( \dot r^2 + r^2 \dot\theta^2 + r^2 sin^2 \theta \dot \phi^2) <br />

And

<br /> T&#039; = \frac{1}{2}( \dot r^2 + r^2 \dot\theta^2 + r^2 sin^2 \theta \dot \phi^2) <br />

Now plugging this in Lagrange's equation:
<br /> \frac {d} {dt} \frac {\partial T&#039;} {\partial \dot \theta} - \frac {\partial T&#039;} {\partial \theta} = r^2 \ddot \theta + 2r \dot r \dot \theta - r^2 \dot \phi^2 sin \theta cos \theta<br /> --------- Line 3

Now, as far as I understand the above equation is a_\theta. That is, the \theta component of acceleration.

However, it seems I am wrong.

My book tells me I have to divide the expression by h_\theta

where

<br /> h_\theta = \left ( \left ( \frac {\partial x} {\partial \theta} \right )^2 <br /> + \left ( \frac {\partial y} {\partial \theta} \right )^2 <br /> + \left ( \frac {\partial z} {\partial \theta} \right )^2 \right )^\frac {1}{2} = ( (r cos \theta cos \phi )^2 + ( (r cos \theta sin \phi )^2 + r^2 sin^2 \theta )^\frac {1}{2} = r<br />

Producing a_\theta = r \ddot \theta + 2 \dot r \dot \theta - r \dot \phi^2 sin \theta cos \theta

So making the reasonable assumption that the book is correct and I am not. What does the expression (Line 3) that I thought was the acceleration represent?

This is especially confusing as I know that if we do not divide T by m then line 3 should produce the force F_\theta??

:frown: :frown: :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A quick check of the units in equation (3) would show that it isn't an aceleration, you have m^{2} s^{-2} not m s^{-2}.
 
Oops. Yep, you is right. Just had a look at the derivation again and I see where my confusion arose.

School-boy error :blushing:

Thanks muchly!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top