Conceptual Question About Simple Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayadds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Motion
AI Thread Summary
When an object is thrown horizontally off a cliff, its horizontal motion does not affect the time it takes to hit the ground, as gravity acts independently on the vertical motion. Both scenarios, whether the object is dropped or thrown, result in the same vertical acceleration due to gravity. The horizontal component of motion does not influence the downward motion, making the time to fall identical in both cases, assuming no air resistance. If air drag is considered, it could alter the trajectory and time, but the fundamental principle remains that gravity governs the fall. Therefore, the time taken to reach the ground is the same for both actions.
jayadds
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
If an object was thrown horizontally over a cliff, would you expect it to take longer ot hit the ground below than if it was just dropped over? Please explain.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jayadds said:
If an object was thrown horizontally over a cliff, would you expect it to take longer ot hit the ground below than if it was just dropped over? Please explain.

Many thanks.


What do you think? What affects the time taken to reach the bottom?
 
If we resolve a vector to a 90° component the result is zero. FCos90°=0
Thus orthogonal vector will not effect each other.

In your case the horizontal component(throwing horizontally) will not effect anything what the gravity doing to the object(pulling it down). Both orthogonal to each other.

If your horizontal velocity is very fast it is possible that the object will be in outer space even the dropping height is small.
 
jayadds said:
If an object was thrown horizontally over a cliff, would you expect it to take longer ot hit the ground below than if it was just dropped over? Please explain.

Many thanks.

This situation is very different depending on whether or not you want to take into account air drag. I suggest viewing this without drag.

If you dropped the object off the cliff, what force(s) would be affecting it during its flight?

If you threw the object off the cliff, what force(s) would be affecting it during its flight?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
17K
Back
Top