Conceptual question on the expansion postulate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability of transitioning from an initial quantum state |\Psi_{initial}> to a final state |\Psi_{final}> within a defined basis {|\Phi_{n}>}. The correct probability is given by |<\Psi_{final}|\Psi_{initial}>|^{2}, which represents the overlap between the two states. The confusion arises from the interpretation of the final state, as it is essential to clarify that the final state is not merely the initial state but rather the state the system is projected onto after evolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of state vectors and kets
  • Knowledge of probability amplitudes in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of wavefunction collapse
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of quantum state transitions
  • Learn about the role of inner products in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the Born rule in probability calculations
  • Investigate the concept of wavefunction evolution in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum state transitions, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum probability.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't a homework question, but here goes:

Suppose I have a system in an initial state |\Psi_{initial}> within the basis {|\Phi_{n}&gt;} and later on I have a final state |\Psi_{final}> within the same basis, and I want to know the probability of ending up in the latter state.

Now, since &lt;\Phi_{n}|\Psi&gt; = c_{n}, would the probability just be |&lt;\Psi_{final}|\Psi_{initial}&gt;|^{2}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er...isn't the final state defined such that your system is in the "final" state at the end? ...

What you have there is the probability that the final state "is still the initial state".
 
I see what your'e saying, but the wording confuses me. For the question is "what is the probability that you end up in the final state." If we had been given a different problem with an initial wavefunction (for the infinite square well, for example) and instead we were asked "what is the probability that the particle will be found in the ground state", then we would naturally say &lt;\phi_{1}|\Psi(x)&gt;. So, to the laymen, wouldn't it seem logical to ask what is \Psi_{final} acting on the ket of \Psi_{initial}?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
982
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K