Conceptual Question regarding Uncertainty Principle

lee_sarah76
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This could be one of those questions where I'm hindered by my lack of knowledge on the subject, being only a freshman in college, but recently we learned the uncertainty principle which states that:

ΔE*Δt ≥ h/4π

Given this, I'm assuming it'd be accurate to rewrite ΔE as Δm*c2, which would lead to an equation where mass is uncertain.

But given that mass is an intrinsic property of matter, how can mass be uncertain?

Again, sorry if this is a silly question, but I'm just curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E=mc^2 is valid only if you consider particles at rest (but what is "at rest" when the motion is uncertain?) or use the old concept of a relativistic mass (don't do that) - and then mass is not an intrinsic property of matter.

For short-living and virtual particles, masses are "uncertain" (they show a broad distribution). The http://www.etp.physik.uni-muenchen.de/opal/opal_en.html is a prominent example of this effect (first plot - the experimental energy resolution is much better than the width of the distribution).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top