Conceptual Understanding - simple

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conceptual understanding of vector addition and proportionality in relation to a past examination question. The original poster seeks clarification on why the sum of two vectors can be expressed as a multiple of the vector (i - 2j). The Examiner's Report indicates that many students incorrectly identified the sum as equal to (i - 2j) instead of a multiple of it, hindering their progress. The conversation explains that by introducing a proportionality constant, c, one can derive the relationship between the added vectors and their parallel representation. This highlights the importance of understanding vector relationships and proportionality in solving such problems.
elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
I would like to formally state that this is NOT a Homework question. I am NOT trying to cheat to get good marks. Instead the attached pdf file is a past examination question paper.

Just take my word for it and I can do without the aggro of mods jumping on back.

I would be EXTREMELY grateful if you could actually EXPLAIN the concept behind Question 6 B of the attached file.

The Examiner's Report that accompanies the question paper says this :

the first mark was for adding the two vectors together but many students then stated that this sum was equal to (i – 2j) rather than a multiple of it and were unable to make any progress.

I am more interested in the THEORY behind the part in bold. What is the concept ? Why do we equate the multiple of (i-2j) ?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Let c be the proportionality constant (between the parallel vectors).
4+p=c
-5+q=-2c
The left hand sides are the result of adding the given vectors. The right hand sides are for the given parallel.
Eliminate c from the two equations gives the stated result.
 
I see... Thank you very much.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top