Conditional probability with joint condition

Cognac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So say I have Pr(Z|X&Y)

I'm guessing that it follows the standard Pr(A|B)=[Pr(B|A)Pr(A)]/Pr(B)

So Pr(Z|X&Y)=[Pr(X&Y|Z)Pr(Z)]/Pr(X&Y)?Also, if X&Y are independent, then would I get Pr(X&Y|Z)=Pr(X|Z)Pr(Y|Z)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cognac said:
Pr(A|B)=Pr(B|A)Pr(A)
What? If A=B, this would say that Pr(A)=1.
Also, if X&Y are independent, then would I get Pr(X&Y|Z)=Pr(X|Z)Pr(Y|Z)?
No. A and B may be independent in general but not independent given Z. Example: toss two coins. A=coin 1 is heads. B=coin 2 is heads. Z=coins 1 and 2 match. Obviously Z forces a dependence between A and B.
 
Last edited:
FactChecker said:
What? If A=B, this would say that Pr(A)=1.

No. A and B may be independent in general but not independent given Z. Example: toss two coins. A=coin 1 is heads. B=coin 2 is heads. Z=coins 1 and 2 match. Obviously Z forces a dependence between A and B.
Thanks, that example about independence makes things make more sense now.

Oh sorry about that. I forgot to divide by the conditional. But does Bayes Rule still work for the case I presented? Given two joint events, X&Y?
 
Cognac said:
I forgot to divide by the conditional. But does Bayes Rule still work for the case I presented? Given two joint events, X&Y?
By "divide by the conditional", I assume you mean "divide the right side by P(A)". Yes, Bayes' Rule always works. The only exception to the form of Bayes' Rule that you are using is if P(A) = 0. Then both P(B|A) and the division of the right side by 0 are problems. (Some statements of Bayes' Rule talk about a partitioning of the space. If you use ever that form, make sure that condition is met.)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top