Conducting slab between a parallel-plate-capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tufts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conducting
AI Thread Summary
A conducting slab inserted between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor divides the capacitor into two sections, but it behaves differently than initially assumed. The correct approach involves recognizing that the slab creates two capacitors in parallel, not in series, leading to the capacitance formula C_eq = ε₀A/(s - d). The position of the slab does not affect the overall capacitance, as the total distance between the plates remains constant. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering the permittivity of the slab when calculating capacitance. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
Tufts
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is a problem I found while studying for an exam I have next thursday, and conceptually it doesn't make any sense for me!

NOTE - This is not a dieletrics problem.

Homework Statement


A conducting slab with a thickness d and area A is inserted into the space between the plates of a parallel-plate-capacitor with spacing s and area A. What is the value of the capacitance of the system?

Diagram of the system:

------------------------

//////////////////////////// < Conducter Slab (d wide, with area A)

------------------------


Homework Equations



C = \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{d} (1)

Capacitors in parallel combination: C_{eq} = C_{1} + C_{2} (2)
Capacitors in series combination: \frac{1}{C_{eq}}= \frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}} (3)

The Attempt at a Solution


At first sight, I immediately identified this problem as a simple series capacitor combination problem. Why? The conducter slab inbetween the plates will divide the existing capacitor into two after reaching eletrostatic equilibrium, as in the diagram:

+Q
--------------------
< First capacitor
-Q
--------------------
///////////////////////
--------------------
+Q
< Second capacitor
--------------------
-Q

Since the slab is a conductor, it acts as a bridge or a conducting wire between these two capacitors. One capacitor after the other, seems to be series for me. Knowing that, I used equation 1 (where d = 2(s - d)) to find the individual values of the capacitors, and used it along with equation 3 to find the equivalent capacitor.

My answer: C_{eq} = \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{4(s-d)}

Unfortunately that wasn't correct. The real answer was \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{s-d} which after reverse engineering, used parallel combination instead of series. Like I said before, this doesn't make sense at all for me.

Can anyone explain this? I would appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Tufts said:
A conducting slab with a thickness d and area A is inserted into the space between the plates of a parallel-plate-capacitor with spacing s and area A. What is the value of the capacitance of the system?

Since the slab is a conductor, it acts as a bridge or a conducting wire between these two capacitors. One capacitor after the other, seems to be series for me. Knowing that, I used equation 1 (where d = 2(s - d)) …

Hi Tufts! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Isn't d = (s - d)/2?
 
Oh no! Silly me!

I guess I was thinking too hard on this question, and blatantly ignoring an obvious mistake. Thanks for noticing. I'm glad that at least my analysis of the system was correct.
 
The slab does not have to be in the middle. The nice thing is that the result does not depend on the position of the slab.
It would be interesting (and quite easy) to try to solve the problem in the general case.
I mean, take s1 and s2 as spacing for the two capacitors, with s1+s2=d-s
 
Well it makes sense why it would work for any position. If one of the distances get larger, the other one has to get smaller in the same proportion. This way the sum is always the same.
 
Now I'm doing some excercises on capacitors and I found a pretty similar one to this, and I this the answer given here is not correct (if I'm wrong, please tell me, because on this depends my exam result :-p ).

I think that we have to remember about the the permittivity of the slab (εr), because the electric field in the slab is different than in the capacitor.
So the capacitance will be:

C=\frac{\epsilon S}{d-b+\frac{b}{\epsilon r }}

where d is the distance between plates of capacitor and b is the thickness of the slab.

If anyone could tell me is it correct, I would really appreciate it. :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top