Confirming Conjugate Factor of Cubic Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael_Light
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate Cubic
AI Thread Summary
If a cubic equation f(x) has a root of (3+√2), it does not necessarily imply that (3-√2) is also a root unless specific conditions are met. These conditions include having rational coefficients, three real roots, and at least one rational root. If the cubic has a rational constant term, the presence of (3+√2) as a root suggests that there must be another root that rationalizes it. The discussion clarifies that while conjugate roots are typically associated with complex numbers, the relationship between roots in this case depends on the nature of the coefficients and the roots themselves. Therefore, the original statement about conjugate factors is not universally true.
Michael_Light
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a cubic equation, f(x) has a factor of (3+√2), then the conjugate of the factor, (3-√2) is also a factor for f(x).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Just to confirm is that statement correct? I read it else where but i not sure is it correct or wrong, if yes, can anyone explain why? Thanks..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A factor would be something of the form (x - a), where a is a root. You have number. Please clarify what you mean.
 
voko said:
A factor would be something of the form (x - a), where a is a root. You have number. Please clarify what you mean.

Sorry.. i mean root.. not factor.. so is this statement correct then?

If a cubic equation, f(x) has a root of (3+√2), then the conjugate of the root, (3-√2) is also a root for f(x).
 
Only complex roots are conjugate. Your root is not complex, so it cannot have a conjugate in the strict sense of the word (i.e, the one whose imaginary part has an opposite sign), nor can it have a "conjugate" in the sense you are using it.

Consider x3 = (3+√2)3. Then (3+√2) is its only root (more technically, it has three identical roots).
 
Michael_Light said:

Homework Statement



If a cubic equation, f(x) has a factor of (3+√2), then the conjugate of the factor, (3-√2) is also a factor for f(x).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Just to confirm is that statement correct? I read it else where but i not sure is it correct or wrong, if yes, can anyone explain why? Thanks..

Not true in general.

It is true, however, if the following conditions are met:

1) Your cubic has rational coefficients.

2) It has 3 real roots.

3) One root is rational.

If those conditions are met, then the other two real roots will either both be rational, or conjugate surds (Technically, the other roots will be algebraic numbers of degree \leq 2).
 
Michael_Light said:

Homework Statement



If a cubic equation, f(x) has a factor of (3+√2), then the conjugate of the factor, (3-√2) is also a factor for f(x).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Just to confirm is that statement correct? I read it else where but i not sure is it correct or wrong, if yes, can anyone explain why? Thanks..
If the cubic equation has a rational constant term, then you know that there exists another root that must rationalize that root of 3+\sqrt{2} because when we multiply all the roots together, we will get the constant term of the cubic equation.

So if for example we have a general cubic

ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 where d is rational, another form of the cubic will be

a(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)=0 where \alpha, \beta,\gamma are the roots of the cubic. So the constant term, d, must be equal to the constant term of the factored cubic, hence
a(-\alpha)(-\beta)(-\gamma)=-a\alpha\beta\gamma=d
And since \alpha = 3+\sqrt{2} then
-(3+\sqrt{2})\beta\gamma=d

Now from this we can see that for this expression to be equal to a rational constant d, \beta\gamma must be irrational such that it can cancel the 3+\sqrt{2} factor. Now if we assume that one of the roots is rational, then the other root must be of the form c(3-\sqrt{2}) for some constant c. However, if we don't make that assumption, then the only condition we need is to satisfy \beta\gamma = 3-\sqrt{2} which there are an infinite number of combinations for.

For example,
\beta = \gamma = \sqrt{3-\sqrt{2}}
\beta = \sqrt{2}, \gamma = \frac{3\sqrt{2}}{2}-2

etc.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top