Confirming Stationary Minima & Convexity of a Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahamdiheme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Minima
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses whether having stationary points that are minimums qualifies a function as convex. It clarifies that this is not necessarily true, using an example of a function with stationary minimum points that is not convex. Additionally, it notes that a function with a single stationary minimum does not guarantee that this point is the global minimum. The conversation also touches on the concepts of local and global minima, as well as the characteristics of concavity and convexity in functions. Overall, the relationship between stationary points and convexity is complex and requires careful analysis.
ahamdiheme
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
If the stationary points of a function are minimum points does that qualify the function to be a convex function?
Also, if the function has only one stationary minimum point does that mean that that point is its global minimum?
Can someone please confirm these for me
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ahamdiheme said:
If the stationary points of a function are minimum points does that qualify the function to be a convex function?
Not necessarily. Consider the function f, whose graph is the union over all even integers n of the functions f_n(x) = (x + n)^2 each defined over the interval [n-1, n+1]. All of f's stationary points are minimum points, but f is not convex on [n, n + 2] for even n. Perhaps you mean critical points instead of stationary points?
 
ahamdiheme said:
Also, if the function has only one stationary minimum point does that mean that that point is its global minimum?
Thank you

If "stationary minimum" is the same as "local minimum", then not necessarily.

Look at the graph of -x^4 + x^2[/tex]. You can see that it has only one local minimum at x=0, but it's global minimum is at ±∞.
 
Considering the shape of the graph, that makes it convex right?
 
I may possibly not be very well versed in the subject, but I'm fairly sure that a graph is either "concave up", "concave down", or neither. I have never used the term convex to describe a 2-d Cartesian graph. The graph I supplied is concave for one interval and concave down at two intervals. You can solve at these points of inflection (where the graph changes from concave up to concave down) by using the second derivative test.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_derivative_test
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top