Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Conformal spacetime

  1. May 21, 2010 #1
    Dear all,

    In flat conformal space-time,

    [tex]e.g. \quad g_{\alpha \beta} = e^{4\kappa} \eta_{\alpha \beta}[/tex]

    where [tex]\kappa[/tex] is some function of space-time coordinates.

    What sort of paths do photons and massive particles follow? Could anyone describe their paths with some analagy or a picture? What is the difference between conformally flat space-time and flat space-time physically?

    Moreover, if the space-time is only conformal but not flat, what does this mean physically? Why is conformal /conformal flat space-time useful in GR?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 21, 2010 #2
    Coordinate transformations on spacetime are not conformal (angle preserving). Why would you think they are?
  4. May 21, 2010 #3
    My understanding is:

    Conformal transformations of the metric preserve the causal structure of spacetime, so the paths of light rays are unchanged. Conformally flat spaces will therefore have the same light cone structure as Minkowski space.

    One of the reasons conformal transformations of spacetime are useful is to "bring in" infinity so that it can be represented on a diagram (Penrose diagram/Carter diagram or whatever), but the causal structure of the diagram is identical to that of the original spacetime.
  5. May 23, 2010 #4
    This is correct.

    Photons would simply have the same path as if they were to travel in a Minkowski spacetime. This can be easily proven in the metric you're giving as an example and I suppose you know how to prove it. But in case of massive particles, I have to prove how their paths undergo some change and in fact show how massive particles move along time-like curves. In the following, I take [tex]s[/tex] to be the affine parameter of the time-like curves followed by particles and for simplicity I also take [tex]\kappa[/tex] to be a function of the coordinate [tex]x[/tex] in Cartesian coordinates [tex]x^{\alpha}:=(t,x,y,z).[/tex] The line element is


    This can be written as


    where the overdots represent differentiation wrt [tex]s[/tex]. Now working this into the Euler-Lagrangian equations gives the 4 geodesic equations:


    Using [tex]\dot{\kappa}=\frac{d\kappa}{dt}\dot{t}[/tex] the first of these 4 equations can be rewritten as

    [tex]\ddot{t}+4\dot{t}\dot{x}\frac{d\kappa}{dt}=0.[/tex] (*)

    Now from this and that


    where we have made use of (*), the second of the geodesic equations can be cast into the following form:

    [tex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+2\frac{d\kappa}{dt}e^{-4\kappa}\dot{t}^{-2}=0.[/tex] (**)

    Integrating the time-related geodesic equation yields


    where [tex]a[/tex] is the integration constant. Introducing this into (**) gives


    which is the ultimate form of the second geodesic equation. The other two remaining equations are, in a somewhat similar way, found to be


    You can see that if [tex]\kappa=0[/tex] then all geodesic equations belong to the Minkowski metric. But since [tex]\kappa[/tex] is a function of the coordinate [tex]x[/tex], among the spatial geodesic equations only the equation corresponding to the [tex]x[/tex] component of the coordinate 3-acceleration has been modified and the other two are just the same as those of the Minkowski spacetime.

    Considering pseudo-Riemannian, these are spacetimes that under a special condition can be mapped into flat spacetimes with metric components being -1 or +1 even though their Riemann tensor before mapping is not necessarily zero. The condition is that the vanishing of the Weyl tensor must be guaranteed for the spacetime to be conformally flat. In such spacetimes, all angles are preserved if the whole of spacetime (if the spacetime is conformally flat not locally conformally flat) gets mapped by a conformal transformation. One of the most significant class of conformally flat spacetimes is the constant-curvature class i.e. spacetimes with a constant curvature.

    Last edited: May 23, 2010
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook